Author Topic: Incorrect Census transcriptions on Ancestry  (Read 49229 times)

Offline sunnylady2005

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 41
    • View Profile
Re: Incorrect Census transcriptions on Ancestry
« Reply #90 on: Wednesday 01 November 06 21:08 GMT (UK) »
I have to say that I only trust my own research or those of people with whom I have made contact who I know are doing the research.

I have now put postem notes against a couple of things in a tree where if the owner had done the research instead of making an assumption (which actually was the assumption I had made until I did the research!) they would know they were wrong. 

I contacted the owner, who had relied on this name (someone who is quite well know and who has a public biog) without checking things like place and date of birth.  I said I had the actual certs which confirmed my research.  But still it remains the same and unaltered, even though the tree has been updated, and I have never had a response from the owner at all.   And now a cousin is pointing me to the tree as if it is the law of the ......

Oh well.....
Knox (Greenlaw/Claydub/Edinburgh);
Syme or Sime (North Berwick/Montrose (Brechin);
McMurtrie (Dalmellington); Lamont/Limont(?);
Williams (Hampstead)/Glamorgan;
Lord (Hampstead/Lancashire);
Isaac (Wiltshire/Gower Peninsula) ;
Rowen or Rowan (Manchester);
Greenwood (Lancashire);
Also Forsythe; Kyle; Trotter; Hislop/Hoslop; Henderson; Chaplin; Parr; Mc Lean; Gourlay ; Harford

Offline scruffypup

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,105
    • View Profile
Re: Incorrect Census transcriptions on Ancestry
« Reply #91 on: Thursday 02 November 06 13:13 GMT (UK) »
Hi Carole

I've had the same problem with the do as in Alex Bonalliedo and also people such as my gran Olive Gwendoline Leng who was born 5 Nov 1905 always coming up as Dec 1905 on Ancestry and several other sites.  Do you think they are all sharing the same database as it saves time on paying researchers? 

Many thanks for all the help you've given me on my family tree it's coming along well

Yours Julie

Offline loo

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,345
    • View Profile
Re: Incorrect Census transcriptions on Ancestry
« Reply #92 on: Sunday 05 November 06 10:46 GMT (UK) »
During the ancestry blitz over the last few days, I found a new-to-me type of ancestry error.  It made me absolutely furious.

I am not using the real names here, but this is how it goes.  I have a Peter Schmidt on the 1901.  I know he's there because I have found him before.  I wanted to check a detail.  This time, when I searched, he was nowhere to be found.  Fortunately I had saved the census page number etc., and entered that, and then he popped up.  The reason I had not found him at first was because ancestry, in their great wisdom, had decided that since he was a boarder, that he should now acquire the surname of the householder.  So his name is now Peter Schmidt Bakerman, according to them.  I couldn't believe this.  To go in there and change what was right, in order to make it wrong, I just don't understand this.  And, by the way, there was no "Do" or "So" or anything like that after his surname on the enumerator's list.  Yes, I have sent a correction, but how many of these are there?  Not a hope in hades of finding them by their real names, as most of us don't know in advance who was boarding with whom.
ARMSTRONG - Castleton Scot; NB; Westminstr Twp
BARFIELD - Nailsea
BRAKE - Nailsea
BURIATTE
CANDY - M'sex, Deptford
CLIFFORD - Maidstone
DURE(E) - France, Devon, Canada
HALLS - Chigwell
KREIN, Peter/Adam - Germany
LEOPOLD - Hanover, London
LATTIMER, MAXWELL - Ldn lightermen
MEYER - Lauenstein
MURRAY - Scot borders
STEWART - Chelsea; Reach
SWANICK - Mayo & Roscommon; Ontario
WEST - Rochester & Maidstone
WILLIS - Wilts, Berks, Hants, London
WOODHOUSE - Bristol tobacconist, London
WW1 internees

Offline MarthaJane

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 66
    • View Profile
Re: Incorrect Census transcriptions on Ancestry
« Reply #93 on: Wednesday 15 November 06 19:52 GMT (UK) »
I am new to geneaology and have only been searching for the past week.  Luckily I have been helped by Janan who has been looking on the original census returns for me (I couldn't decide whether to get a subscription or not)

Today Janan sent me some information which when I accessed the transcribed information came up as Abertillery, when the original says Abergenfy (we assume this is a mis-spelling as we are looking at Abergwynfi)  I know Welsh place names are notoriously difficult and they mutate all the time and the handwriting is awful but I could have dismissed this link as Abertillery is the wrong place but Abergwynfi is the right place.

Does anyone have any experience with other (subscription) sites?
Nicholls, Devon and Glamorgan<br />Heath, Wiltshire and Glamorgan<br />Messam, Wiltshire and Glamorgan<br/> Clapham, Bender, Middlesex
Cook, Hampshire, London
Edbrook, Devon and London
Gibson, London
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Offline kerryb

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,934
    • View Profile
Re: Incorrect Census transcriptions on Ancestry
« Reply #94 on: Wednesday 15 November 06 19:55 GMT (UK) »
I signed up to a 72 hour access to British Origins yesterday because I wanted to check some London marriages.  Didn't find any that I wanted so to use my sub I thought I would go through the 1841 census and see if I could find any missing ones.

So far I have downloaded 7 copies of 1841 census returns that I have been unable to find on Ancestry.  Hmmm!!!

Coverage is not great but the transcription is obviously better.

 :-\ :-\ :-\

Kerry
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Searching for my family - Baldwin - Sussex, Middlesex, Cork, Pilbeam - Sussex, Harmer - Sussex, Terry - Surrey, Kent, Rhoades - Lincs, Roffey - Surrey, Traies - Devon & Middlesex & many many more to be found on my website ....

Offline Necromancer

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 18,073
  • I've updated my profile ......
    • View Profile
Re: Incorrect Census transcriptions on Ancestry
« Reply #95 on: Wednesday 15 November 06 19:58 GMT (UK) »
yes, I agree Kerry - and Origins is 'better' than the Genealogist place ....
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline kerryb

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,934
    • View Profile
Re: Incorrect Census transcriptions on Ancestry
« Reply #96 on: Wednesday 15 November 06 20:00 GMT (UK) »
Well I wasn't impressed with Origins after that free offer fiasco earlier this year but I'm beginning to wonder now!  Do I renew Ancestry or look elsewhere.

Actually findmypast.com is fast becoming the English equivalent of Ancestry and I am impressed with it.  I always find bmds on there that I fail to find on Ancestry.

Kerry
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Searching for my family - Baldwin - Sussex, Middlesex, Cork, Pilbeam - Sussex, Harmer - Sussex, Terry - Surrey, Kent, Rhoades - Lincs, Roffey - Surrey, Traies - Devon & Middlesex & many many more to be found on my website ....

Offline Necromancer

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 18,073
  • I've updated my profile ......
    • View Profile
Re: Incorrect Census transcriptions on Ancestry
« Reply #97 on: Wednesday 15 November 06 20:13 GMT (UK) »
Yes, and I dont understand why - the GRO only 'sell' (licence) 1 version of the full Indices ?
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline stonechat

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,682
    • View Profile
Re: Incorrect Census transcriptions on Ancestry
« Reply #98 on: Wednesday 15 November 06 22:33 GMT (UK) »
Yes, and I dont understand why - the GRO only 'sell' (licence) 1 version of the full Indices ?
Actually there is another version - that held at the local offices - which sites such as Cheshire BMD use

Bob
Douglas, Varnden, Joy(i)ce Surrey, Clarke Northants/Hunts, Pullen Worcs/Herefords, Holmes Birmingham/USA/Canada/Australia, Jackson Cheshire/Yorkshire, Lomas Cheshire, Lee Yorkshire, Cocks Lancashire, Leah Cheshire, Cook Yorkshire, Catlow Lancashire
See my website http://www.cotswan.com