Author Topic: Wedding atire, 1932  (Read 459 times)

Offline Karen McDonald

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,497
  • ** THINK POSITIVE! **
    • View Profile
Wedding atire, 1932
« on: Wednesday 18 February 26 09:49 GMT (UK) »
Hi everybody,

I don't need this photo cleaned or dated.  ;D
I would, however, be grateful for opinions as to whether it might have been a wedding photo. My grandparents married in 1932, when he was 22 and she was 19.

If they didn't have a big white wedding, might these have been their wedding outfits?

Thanks,
Karen
McDonald MacDonald M'Donald McGregor MacGregor M'Gregor Twilley Wells Fentiman Carrington Rowe Needham Mitchell Mackie Collingwood Fuller Maides Shilton Hagon Budd

Offline Treetotal

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 28,667
    • View Profile
Re: Wedding atire, 1932
« Reply #1 on: Saturday 21 February 26 14:04 GMT (UK) »
Hi Karen...
It could be, Not everyone wore traditional wedding attire, they just wore their Sunday Best outfits which are more practical and serviceable.
Carol
CAPES Hull. KIRK  Leeds, Hull. JONES  Wales,  Lancashire. CARROLL Ireland, Lancashire, U.S.A. BROUGHTON Leicester, Goole, Hull BORRILL  Lincolnshire, Durham, Hull. GROOM  Wishbech, Hull. ANTHONY St. John's Nfld. BUCKNALL Lincolnshire, Hull. BUTT Harbour Grace, Newfoundland. PARSONS  Western Bay, Newfoundland. MONAGHAN  Ireland, U.S.A. PERRY Cheshire, Liverpool.
 
RESTORERS:PLEASE DO NOT USE MY RESTORES WITHOUT PRIOR PERMISSION - THANK YOU

Offline fiddlerslass

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,377
  • William Thompson Stainer copy 1880
    • View Profile
Re: Wedding atire, 1932
« Reply #2 on: Saturday 21 February 26 14:24 GMT (UK) »
Did they have a registry office wedding?

I would have expected them to have a buttonhole flower or corsage if it was a wedding. Perhaps it is the engagement?
Bulman, DUR
Butterfield DUR
 & N. YKS,
Crawhall & Ions Weardale
Earnshaw DUR
Hopps DUR & N. YKS
Howe, Richardson,Thompson all DUR

William Thompson violin maker Bishop Auckland
William Thompson jun. Violin maker Leeds

Richardson in Bermondsey/East Ham, descendants of William Richardson b. 1820 Bishop Auckland

Berger, Bareš, Fritsch, Ritschel, Pechanz, Funke, Straka & others from Czechia
Endesfelder from Saxony
Ripke from Poland

Offline Treetotal

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 28,667
    • View Profile
Re: Wedding atire, 1932
« Reply #3 on: Saturday 21 February 26 15:19 GMT (UK) »
Yes I thought about that too, my Grandparent's got married in a Register Office, and looking at their photo, They are both nicely dressed but no sign of flowers, but they were married late in the year.
She wore a pretty blouse with a skirt with a frill round the bottom, Grandad wore a three piece suit with am Albert watch chain.
They looked lovely but they were not very well off and they both came from big working class Families.
They are not smiling either.
Carol
CAPES Hull. KIRK  Leeds, Hull. JONES  Wales,  Lancashire. CARROLL Ireland, Lancashire, U.S.A. BROUGHTON Leicester, Goole, Hull BORRILL  Lincolnshire, Durham, Hull. GROOM  Wishbech, Hull. ANTHONY St. John's Nfld. BUCKNALL Lincolnshire, Hull. BUTT Harbour Grace, Newfoundland. PARSONS  Western Bay, Newfoundland. MONAGHAN  Ireland, U.S.A. PERRY Cheshire, Liverpool.
 
RESTORERS:PLEASE DO NOT USE MY RESTORES WITHOUT PRIOR PERMISSION - THANK YOU


Online BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,927
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Wedding atire, 1932
« Reply #4 on: Saturday 21 February 26 15:47 GMT (UK) »
OH and I married in August, 1964 in a Register Office.  No flowers, but I did wear a hat  ::) ::) and both of us wore a suit.

My parents married in 1933, in church, but not the full wedding regalia - she wore a dress (not the traditional wedding dress) and hat, and my father wore a 3-piece suit.  Both wore button-holes, as did the best man and bridesmaid.
Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY

Offline louisa maud

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,746
    • View Profile
Re: Wedding atire, 1932
« Reply #5 on: Saturday 21 February 26 17:21 GMT (UK) »
You are just a step ahead of us on anniversaries Bumble, 29th August 1964.

LM
Census information is Crown Copyright,
from  www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Granath Sweden and London
Garner, Marylebone Paddington  Northolt Ilford
Garner, Devon
Garner New Zealand
Maddieson
Parkinson St Pancras,
Jenkins Marylebone Paddington
Mizon/Mison/Myson Paddington
Tindal Marylebone Paddington
Tocock, (name changed to Ellis) London
Southam Marylebone, Paddington
Bragg Lambeth 1800's
Edermaniger(Maniger) Essex Kent Canada (Toronto)
Coveney Kent Lambeth
Sondes kent and London

Online BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,927
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Wedding atire, 1932
« Reply #6 on: Saturday 21 February 26 17:41 GMT (UK) »
Don't want to take over this thread, but - LM.  We met in early 1964 in lodgings, got thrown out one night by the others for having a newspaper fight, so went to the pub.  Continued during weekdays, then I got my sailing date as I was emigrating to NZ.  "Don't go to NZ, come to London with me and we'll get married."  So I did that and we'v been together ever since.  :-*
Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY

Offline louisa maud

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,746
    • View Profile
Re: Wedding atire, 1932
« Reply #7 on: Saturday 21 February 26 18:02 GMT (UK) »
A lovely story.

I think over the years people have married in either what they could afford or what they preferred,  most of my aunts, long gone had white wedding dresses  but nothing like you see now, I imagine my grandparents didn't but as always they  chose what they could afford, I was talking to our plumber  yesterday who told us his friends wedding  recently cost over 60K, i said " I hope she  was worth it  "
 
Nice photo KM.

LM
Census information is Crown Copyright,
from  www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Granath Sweden and London
Garner, Marylebone Paddington  Northolt Ilford
Garner, Devon
Garner New Zealand
Maddieson
Parkinson St Pancras,
Jenkins Marylebone Paddington
Mizon/Mison/Myson Paddington
Tindal Marylebone Paddington
Tocock, (name changed to Ellis) London
Southam Marylebone, Paddington
Bragg Lambeth 1800's
Edermaniger(Maniger) Essex Kent Canada (Toronto)
Coveney Kent Lambeth
Sondes kent and London

Offline Karen McDonald

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,497
  • ** THINK POSITIVE! **
    • View Profile
Re: Wedding atire, 1932
« Reply #8 on: Wednesday 25 February 26 09:22 GMT (UK) »
Hi everybody,

After days of being shut out due to "Database Error", I am back in! Yay!  ;D
Thanks for all the replies.

Firstly, that's a good point re: flowers/buttonhole. Maybe it was their engagement photo.
(It is a lovely photo, isn't it? :))
The wedding was in a Register Office.

As for the other comments: I was born in 1964.  ;D

Thanks again!
Karen

McDonald MacDonald M'Donald McGregor MacGregor M'Gregor Twilley Wells Fentiman Carrington Rowe Needham Mitchell Mackie Collingwood Fuller Maides Shilton Hagon Budd