Author Topic: Probate Clause - 1715  (Read 78 times)

Offline karen58

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 289
    • View Profile
Probate Clause - 1715
« on: Wednesday 04 February 26 09:11 GMT (UK) »
Hi
Would appreciate a transcription of this little clause.

Abbreviations are a nightmare for me.

Thank you kindly
Karen
Platts & Scholefields; Saddleworth
Winterbottoms; Saddleworth and Huddersfield
Pitchforths; Halifax and Huddersfield

Offline horselydown86

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,978
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Probate Clause - 1715
« Reply #1 on: Wednesday 04 February 26 12:33 GMT (UK) »
I've made a beginning, for what little (very little in this case) it's worth.

The last part appears to be:

...Exores pro vero cum

protestac(i)o(n)e &c


The last four words appear to mean something like:  for true, with protestation

Exores is the seond person singular present active subjunctive meaning persuade.

However without the first word it's not much use.

I would say the date is probably:  ijo Jan(uar)ij 1715o

That is, 2 January 1715 (Old Style).  Others could easily see it differently.

It's certainly not a regular probate clause.

Offline Bookbox

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,563
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Probate Clause - 1715
« Reply #2 on: Wednesday 04 February 26 13:10 GMT (UK) »
I would read this as ...

Ex(amina)t(u)m per ex(ecut)ores pro vero cum protestac(i)o(n)e &c.

Examined by the executors as true, with a declaration, etc.

Not sure about the date - could it be 19o with a long descender?

Offline horselydown86

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,978
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Probate Clause - 1715
« Reply #3 on: Thursday 05 February 26 03:01 GMT (UK) »
Not sure about the date - could it be 19o with a long descender?

It well could be.  I was basing my reading on the similarity to the j in Jan(uar)ij.

Against that, the i and j there have clear dots, which don't appear earlier.

It's probably better to say it is either 2 or 19 January.


Offline karen58

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 289
    • View Profile
Re: Probate Clause - 1715
« Reply #4 on: Thursday 05 February 26 06:02 GMT (UK) »
Hi horselydown86 and Bookbox

Thank you

horselydown86, you are right. Its not a probate clause as I have now found that.

Perhaps it is to do with the inventory which was made 06 Dec 1715, and the executor declaring it was a true and perfect inventory

Cheers
Karen



Platts & Scholefields; Saddleworth
Winterbottoms; Saddleworth and Huddersfield
Pitchforths; Halifax and Huddersfield