Author Topic: 1793 Marraige Licence age interpretation  (Read 116 times)

Offline Stewart R

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 493
1793 Marraige Licence age interpretation
« on: Saturday 31 January 26 11:29 GMT (UK) »
Attached is part of a copy of a Marriage licence i have found, from which i am trying to interpret the age of the two parties. Within the red boxed section it refers to their ages, but after which it says "and upwards."

Am i to interpret this as their actual age or just their minimum age.

Regards

Stewart
Reid, Wolfendale, Hawkin, Tapp
Plymouth, Macclesfield, Liverpool.

Offline Little Nell

  • Global Moderator
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 12,029
Re: 1793 Marraige Licence age interpretation
« Reply #1 on: Saturday 31 January 26 12:17 GMT (UK) »
I would interpret that as being 'at least 21' and 'at least 25' - but also remember that these may still be inaccurate.  No proof of the age was requested.

Nell
All census information: Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline AllanUK

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,674
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Re: 1793 Marraige Licence age interpretation
« Reply #2 on: Saturday 31 January 26 13:06 GMT (UK) »
I agree with Nell

Online LizzieL

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 9,747
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Re: 1793 Marraige Licence age interpretation
« Reply #3 on: Saturday 31 January 26 16:54 GMT (UK) »
Remember at this time the age at which a person could marry without parent / guardian approval was 21. So if someone was recorded as "21 and upward" it may not be entirely accurate, they might be below 21 and telling a fib.
Berks / Oxon: Eltham, Annetts, Wiltshire (surname not county), Hawkins, Pembroke, Partridge
Dorset / Hants: Derham, Stride, Purkiss, Sibley
Yorkshire: Pottage, Carr, Blackburn, Depledge
Sussex: Goodyer, Christopher, Trevatt
Lanark: Scott (soldier went to Jersey CI)
Jersey: Fowler, Huelin, Scott


Offline Stewart R

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 493
Re: 1793 Marraige Licence age interpretation
« Reply #4 on: Saturday 31 January 26 17:28 GMT (UK) »
I was thinking the same thing, LizzieL, but i was puzzled that the apparent min ages were different if it was just to confirm that they were "of age"

Thanks for all your replies

Stewart
Reid, Wolfendale, Hawkin, Tapp
Plymouth, Macclesfield, Liverpool.