Author Topic: Devenport Brothers  (Read 110 times)

Offline Siely

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 441
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Devenport Brothers
« on: Saturday 17 January 26 20:54 GMT (UK) »
Devenport brothers Robert (born 25 Jan. 1867) and James (born 1870) were both born in Clonlum , Co. Armagh to Margaret Devenport (died 1883) who was daughter of Hamilton Devenport of Clonlum.
(source irishgeneaology.ie)
On BOTH Robert and James birth records the father's name is omitted, why would this happen ?
(both Margaret and her father Hamilton were illiterate making a "X" on the register so this is unlikely to be the reason for the omission of the father).
Robert later has a William Devonport (miner) as his father on his marriage cert. in Birmingham to a Kate Sylvester in 1891.
Why did he
stay anonymous on birth registrations ? Any thoughts ?
Reformation and Counter Reformation, Agricultural and Industrial Revolutions

Offline heywood

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 42,862
    • View Profile
Re: Devenport Brothers
« Reply #1 on: Saturday 17 January 26 21:47 GMT (UK) »
Just for information, here is Robert’s birth record
https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/birth_returns/births_1867/03490/2282712.pdf
And James https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/birth_returns/births_1870/03327/2219743.pdf
Margaret is a spinster on her death record
https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/deaths_returns/deaths_1883/06356/4823771.pdf

In these kind of circumstances,  people often invented a father for respectability.
Sometimes, they would use a stepfather or grandfather’s name or another male relative.
In this case, as Margaret did not marry and grandfather was not William, it could be just an invention.
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline gaffy

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,166
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Devenport Brothers
« Reply #2 on: Saturday 17 January 26 22:02 GMT (UK) »
I think I see a potential uncle William marrying: (1) Mary Jane Donnelly (1867); (2) Susan Patterson (1887), he wasn't a miner but maybe he was the inspiration for the invention of the name. 


Offline heywood

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 42,862
    • View Profile
Re: Devenport Brothers
« Reply #3 on: Saturday 17 January 26 22:38 GMT (UK) »
That looks promising, gaffy.
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Offline Wexflyer

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,471
  • Not Crown Copyright
    • View Profile
Re: Devenport Brothers
« Reply #4 on: Saturday 17 January 26 23:26 GMT (UK) »

Why did he
stay anonymous on birth registrations ? Any thoughts ?

Because legally he wasn't supposed to be named.
The fathers of illegitimate children were not to be named. Except perhaps if they turned up in person at registration and accepted that the child was theirs.
BRENNANx2 Davidstown&Taghmon,Ballybrennan; COOPER St.Helens;CREAN Raheennaskeagh&Ballywalter;COSGRAVE Castlebridge?;CULLEN Lady's Island;CULLETON Forth Commons;CURRAN Hillbrook, Wic;DOYLE Clonee&Tombrack;FOX Knockbrandon; FURLONG Moortown;HAYESx2 Walsheslough&Wex;McGILL Litter;MORRIS Forth Commons;PIERCE Ladys Island;POTTS Bennettstown;REDMOND Gerry; ROCHEx2 Wex; ROCHFORD Ballysampson&Ballyhit;SHERIDAN Moneydurtlow; SINNOTT Wex;SMYTH Gerry&Oulart;WALSH Kilrane&Wex; WHITE Tagoat area

Offline CaroleW

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 74,774
  • Barney 1993-2004
    • View Profile
Re: Devenport Brothers
« Reply #5 on: Saturday 17 January 26 23:50 GMT (UK) »
It was the same situation with birth registration in England.  If a child is illegitimate, the biological father has to attend the registration & sign the register which acknowledges the child as his.

If he refuses to attend or sign - his name cannot appear on the birth cert for obvious (& probably legal) reasons.  My late uncle fathered a child with a married woman in 1936 but signed the birth register

Present day - I don't know what the position is if a DNA test proves he is the father
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Carlin (Ireland & Liverpool) Doughty & Wright (Liverpool) Dick & Park (Scotland & Liverpool)

Offline Jon_ni

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 837
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Devenport Brothers
« Reply #6 on: Yesterday at 02:16 »
Quote
Because legally he wasn't supposed to be named.
The fathers of illegitimate children were not to be named. Except perhaps if they turned up in person at registration and accepted that the child was theirs.

Actually legally the mother could name any person she liked as father from the start of civil registration 1864 up to when the Births and Deaths Registration Act (Ireland), 1880 came into force on 1 Jan 1881.
In the 1863 Act there was no "Saving for father of illegitimate child".

Eighteenth Annual Report of the Registrar-General of Marriages, Births, and Deaths in Ireland 1881.
page 3. https://archive.org/details/op1251206-1001/page/n5/mode/2up

Amongst minor changes may be mentioned:
3. Prior to 1881, the mother of an illegitimate child could, acting as informant, have the name of any person inserted in the register as father of such child.
Under the new Statute the Registrar is prohibited from entering the name of any person as father of an illegitimate child, unless at the joint request of the mother and of the person acknowledging himself to be the father of such child, both of whose signatures are required to the entry.


The first 5 to 6 pages of the introduction, up to the comment regarding Roman Catholic marriage registration defects, are a useful summary & explaination of the changes.

Edit: for completeness:
The Registration of Births and Deaths (Ireland) Act 1863
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/26-27/11/pdfs/ukpga_18630011_en.pdf
Births and Deaths Registration Act (Ireland) 1880.
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/43-44/13/enacted

The "saving for father" applied in England and Wales from their 1874 Act, updating the 1836.
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/37-38/88/enacted

Offline Wexflyer

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,471
  • Not Crown Copyright
    • View Profile
Re: Devenport Brothers
« Reply #7 on: Yesterday at 02:19 »
Very interesting. Thank you
BRENNANx2 Davidstown&Taghmon,Ballybrennan; COOPER St.Helens;CREAN Raheennaskeagh&Ballywalter;COSGRAVE Castlebridge?;CULLEN Lady's Island;CULLETON Forth Commons;CURRAN Hillbrook, Wic;DOYLE Clonee&Tombrack;FOX Knockbrandon; FURLONG Moortown;HAYESx2 Walsheslough&Wex;McGILL Litter;MORRIS Forth Commons;PIERCE Ladys Island;POTTS Bennettstown;REDMOND Gerry; ROCHEx2 Wex; ROCHFORD Ballysampson&Ballyhit;SHERIDAN Moneydurtlow; SINNOTT Wex;SMYTH Gerry&Oulart;WALSH Kilrane&Wex; WHITE Tagoat area

Offline Siely

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 441
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Devenport Brothers
« Reply #8 on: Yesterday at 06:25 »
Thank you all for your help.
Heywood- I have noted your point that Margaret was a Spinster on her death record.
Margaret may have had a brother David who married Margaret Ferguson also in Clonlum area.
(Two Donnelly witnesses on marriage cert.)
The anonymous father of both Margaret Devenport's children is going to be difficult to pinpoint.
Reformation and Counter Reformation, Agricultural and Industrial Revolutions