Author Topic: Ure Westall, 1939 Register  (Read 222 times)

Offline Dundee

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,542
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Ure Westall, 1939 Register
« Reply #9 on: Monday 15 December 25 03:39 GMT (UK) »
What medical information would they add to 1939 Register - what would be the point?

"...since 1948 the Register had also been used by the National Health Service, who continued updating the records until 1991, when paper-based record keeping was discontinued."

For many people the medical notations would have spanned the whole 50 years up to the 1990's.

Debra  :D

Offline sugarfizzle

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,524
    • View Profile
Re: Ure Westall, 1939 Register
« Reply #10 on: Monday 15 December 25 12:14 GMT (UK) »
Peter Calver from Lost Cousins has a different explanation - apparently has had access to his record when it was later added.

https://www.lostcousins.com/newsletters2/mar16news.htm#NHS

"The information that we can't see on the right-hand page of the 1939 Register......
simply records when the individual concerned moved from one doctor to another."
 
People move around a lot more now,, would move GP many times. Ure didn't move house very much, perhaps she just changed GP frequently.  :)

Margaret
STEER, mainly Surrey, Kent; PINNOCKS/HAINES, Gosport, Hants; BARKER, mainly Broadwater, Sussex; Gosport, Hampshire; LAVERSUCH, Micheldever, Hampshire; WESTALL, London, Reading, Berks; HYDE, Croydon, Surrey; BRIGDEN, Hadlow, Kent and London; TUTHILL/STEPHENS, London
WILKINSON, Leeds, Yorkshire and Liverpool; WILLIAMSON, Liverpool; BEARE, Yeovil, Somerset; ALLEN, Kent and London; GORST, Liverpool; HOYLE, mainly Leeds, Yorkshire

Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.go