1901 Census London

[steve62]

Hi Folks,
Leaving apart prevous postings on this family I have one new question only.

David Goldstein b. 1872 Russia  d. 1910 Liverpool &  Leah Goldstein (neč Labisky) 1874 Russia d. 1946 Manchester
children:  Gertrude b. 1895 (+/- 2 years)  b. St. George in the  East.
                Lazarus  b. 1898  Whitechapel

The question is why can I not find them in 1901 Census in London or elsewhere.

Have all relevant info.

Thank you
Steve62

[*Sandra*]

This one on ancestry..........??
David Goldster - David Goldstein Goldstein

Estimated Birth Year   abt 1873 Russia. Head. Aged 28 years.
Relation to Head   Head

Spouse   Lear Goldster Birth Place   Russia
Civil parish   North Manchester
Ecclesiastical parish   St Thomas Lancashire Registration District   Prestwich
Sub-registration district   Cheetham

David Goldster   28   Head
Lear Goldster 26 Wife

Piece   3767 - Folio   178 - Page number   1
Household schedule number   4

Sandra

[Pennines]

Sandra beat me to it! However no children are with this couple - but it's a coincidence if it isn't David and his wife Leah.

[steve62]

Thank you ladies,
This couple lived in Cheetham Hill and had grocery shop.  A friend in Holland checked this out and never found any children born to this couple.
In 1911 mine were in Liverpool with the children.  David died in 1910.

Thank you for your input
Steve62

[Pennines]

Oh Sorry Steve--- back to the drawing board!

[softly softly]

Just curious, in 1911 census Leah records 2 children born, 2 still alive, 1 died ?

Did they have a daughter Fanny Goldstein born 1896 with mmn Lazinsky

SS

[CaroleW]

The David Goldstein who died 1910 Liverpool was aged 50 so b 1860

[CaroleW]

Lazarus Goldstein b 1898 Whitechapel  mmn  Leibiski??  Nothing for Gertrude

[steve62]

Right Ladies,
Thank you for the input

 CaroleW:
Wrote wrong birth year.  You are right.  His grave in Liverpool has no headstone.  Gertrude use to go now and again to the cemetery and thats how I know he is the father( family talk)

Softly Softly:
Thank you that could be right.

I think the problem with the surname is how someone transcribed the written word.  Also if spoken the transcriber may have written the name how they thought it should be spelt.  I say this as on my fathers' side "Boler" over the years  back was written "Boaler",  "Bowler",  "Boler".  In one case of census;  Parents down as Bowler and children as Boaler and the children used Boaler as their surname thereafter.

I am grateful for your inputs and will soldier on and one day resolve the mystery