Author Topic: Marriage for Mary Cahill and David Kelly  (Read 275 times)

Offline Wexflyer

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,431
  • Not Crown Copyright
    • View Profile
Re: Marriage for Mary Cahill and David Kelly
« Reply #9 on: Friday 24 October 25 05:48 BST (UK) »

Are these the children:  Mary 1811, John 1814, Bridget 1816, Michael 1818, David 1825, Judith 1831 then John 1835

Essnell.   :)

Yes, those are their children, except your list omits John 1809, James 1822, and James 1826, and also the final John was 1834, not 1835.

The parish records go back tp 1780s - transcripts on RootsIreland.  You will probably need to invest in a subscription as they have material that is not available on Anc*stry.
BRENNANx2 Davidstown&Taghmon,Ballybrennan; COOPER St.Helens;CREAN Raheennaskeagh&Ballywalter;COSGRAVE Castlebridge?;CULLEN Lady's Island;CULLETON Forth Commons;CURRAN Hillbrook, Wic;DOYLE Clonee&Tombrack;FOX Knockbrandon; FURLONG Moortown;HAYESx2 Walsheslough&Wex;McGILL Litter;MORRIS Forth Commons;PIERCE Ladys Island;POTTS Bennettstown;REDMOND Gerry; ROCHEx2 Wex; ROCHFORD Ballysampson&Ballyhit;SHERIDAN Moneydurtlow; SINNOTT Wex;SMYTH Gerry&Oulart;WALSH Kilrane&Wex; WHITE Tagoat area

Online Essnell

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 760
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Marriage for Mary Cahill and David Kelly
« Reply #10 on: Friday 24 October 25 07:10 BST (UK) »
Hi Wexflyer,   Thanks a million.    Got the lot for this matches background but Now to work out how she relates to me. 

I have two Kelly connections - this one and another that has a number of inter-connected matches and that one goes to Louth and the Regiments in Dandalk.    It looks very likely to be a mystery link I have been hunting down for ages. 

Thanks for all your help.
Cheers
Essnell

Offline aghadowey

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 52,910
    • View Profile
Re: Marriage for Mary Cahill and David Kelly
« Reply #11 on: Friday 24 October 25 11:45 BST (UK) »
Thanks Aghadowey.   Like I said it was an Ancestry search that wasn't a baptism record.  Just a date of birth and year only.  So whatever transpired I cannot help.   i am satisfied with what i now have from here.  Thanks again.
 Essnell

I think your are missing the point I was making so perhaps I should make it cleaner.
Civil registration of births in Ireland started in 1864. Before that date there was no registration of births. Therefore the birth 'record' you found on Ancestry cannot be a birth registered under civil registration and thus no registration of quarters apply.
Away sorting out DNA matches... I may be gone for some time many years!