Hello everyone,
After further review, the Consular records are a bit strange. There is one set of records up to 1859, and another set from 1860 onwards. I mentioned finding three Nobles, but it seems there were only two. Robert appears in the 1860 onwards records, with volume/page number 3/839. Mary Jane Noble is also there, with the same volume/page number. But Mary Jane also appears in the pre-1860 records with the same volume/page number.
So it seems that Mary Jane, at least, might have been born right at the end of 1859, and somehow got recorded on both sets of records (in the pre-1860 set she's squeezed in between two other rows, clearly as an afterthought).
BUT ..... in the 1871 census, there is a Mary J living with her parents, recorded as having been born in Leeds, with an implied birth year of 1857!!! Robert is also in the census, although living with a married older sister, recorded as having been born in Norway, with an implied birth year of 1859.
They would surely not have christened a girl with the same names as an older sister ... and there is no record of a death of the Norwegian Mary Jane either in the Consular or regular records.
Could Mary Jane have been born in Leeds immediately before the family set sail for Norway? Then, not having registered the birth in Leeds, they registered it on arrival? But why would she also appear in the Consular 1860-onwards records, if she was born around 1857?
I guess I'll just have to order both certificates to answer these questions!
Cheers
Tim