Author Topic: Roger Lonthe baptism  (Read 799 times)

Offline g eli

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 857
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Roger Lonthe baptism
« on: Wednesday 24 September 25 23:35 BST (UK) »
Can anyone tell me what this baptism says, particularly the name  of his father.
Thank you.
Butler Derbyshire & Nottinghamshire
Targoose Lincolnshire : Targus the rest of England
Sollery:Staffordshire & Nottinghamshire
Saunders,  Phillips: Wiltshire
Oldknow: Derbyshire & Nottinghamshire
Hirons or Hiorns: Friswell: Whitmore: Warwickshire
Tanser: Leicestershire & Warwickshire
Kidger: Buxton: Cramp:Leicestershire
Goodall:Griffin: Ford:Minton:Derbyshire
Cormack:Dunn: Scotland
Taylor:Nottinghamshire
Fletcher Derbyshire, Nottinghamshire Staffordshire

Offline horselydown86

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,864
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Roger Lonthe baptism
« Reply #1 on: Thursday 25 September 25 07:05 BST (UK) »
Leaving out the father's firstname it is:

Roger Louthe the sonne of [?] Louthe

was baptised the xjth
(or xith) day of october in

the yeare afores(ai)d



Regarding the firstname:

I believe that most of the name Henery can be discerned between the black lines (see attachment).

Certainly I can see Hen at the beginning and ry at the end.

However the presence of the tall letter about 2/3 of the way along is a concern.  If it is print-through it's very well-defined.

This letter looks very like the f in aforesd in the third line.

The spacing is also troubling - the distance between the n and the r looks too long to be only one letter.

Offline horselydown86

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,864
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Roger Lonthe baptism
« Reply #2 on: Thursday 25 September 25 08:17 BST (UK) »
I now think that Hemfory or a variant is more likely.

ADDED:

Better to suggest:  H?mfory


Offline Bookbox

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,426
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Roger Lonthe baptism
« Reply #3 on: Thursday 25 September 25 08:57 BST (UK) »
ADDED:
Better to suggest:  H?mfory

For what it's worth, I agree. But there may also be something written before the H ?


Offline goldie61

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,946
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Roger Lonthe baptism
« Reply #4 on: Thursday 25 September 25 09:06 BST (UK) »
Not sure it's any easier to see on this?

Lane, Burgess: Cheshire. Finney, Rogers, Gilman:Derbys
Cochran, Nicol, Paton, Bruce:Scotland. Bertolle:London
Bainbridge, Christman, Jeffs: Staffs

Offline g eli

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 857
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Roger Lonthe baptism
« Reply #5 on: Thursday 25 September 25 15:34 BST (UK) »
Thank you all for your replies. Your answers give credence to the hope I had that the father was Humfre in some form or other. Ancestry had Richard which I couldn't see.
Butler Derbyshire & Nottinghamshire
Targoose Lincolnshire : Targus the rest of England
Sollery:Staffordshire & Nottinghamshire
Saunders,  Phillips: Wiltshire
Oldknow: Derbyshire & Nottinghamshire
Hirons or Hiorns: Friswell: Whitmore: Warwickshire
Tanser: Leicestershire & Warwickshire
Kidger: Buxton: Cramp:Leicestershire
Goodall:Griffin: Ford:Minton:Derbyshire
Cormack:Dunn: Scotland
Taylor:Nottinghamshire
Fletcher Derbyshire, Nottinghamshire Staffordshire

Offline horselydown86

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,864
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Roger Lonthe baptism
« Reply #6 on: Thursday 25 September 25 17:51 BST (UK) »
But there may also be something written before the H ?

Thanks Bookbox.  My view on this was that the line which makes the ascender of the top half of the H loops around and then sweeps backwards at a shallower angle.  It can be seen to extend at least halfway back to the f of of.

Rightly or wrongly I took this to mean that when it was written none of the artifacts which now intrude on that area were present.

Offline Bookbox

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,426
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Roger Lonthe baptism
« Reply #7 on: Thursday 25 September 25 17:56 BST (UK) »
Yes, thank you. It's now clearer on goldie61's cleaned up version.