Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Having difficulty with a 18th century marriage surname  (Read 435 times)

Offline dobfarm

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,036
  • Scarcliffe village Derbyshire
    • View Profile
Having difficulty with a 18th century marriage surname
« on: Yesterday at 10:32 »
Hi  All

Please! - I wonder if any member of Rootchat has access to view the original image of this 18th century marriage below to try and make sense of the brides surname.

William Jackson X Elisabeth Mawlivern (As written on familysearch)
Married 27th January 1723 Selby Yorkshire.


Thanks in advance.
In my opinion the marriage residence is not always the place of birth. Never forget Workhouse and overseers accounts records of birth

Offline BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,797
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Having difficulty with a 18th century marriage surname
« Reply #1 on: Yesterday at 10:42 »
Try this!  Original document at Borthwick Institute.
Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY

Offline dobfarm

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,036
  • Scarcliffe village Derbyshire
    • View Profile
Re: Having difficulty with a 18th century marriage surname
« Reply #2 on: Yesterday at 11:25 »
Thank Sue,

Great help!

'McGivern' or MacGivern

Hope you and OH are keeping well  :)

Take care!

Dave.
In my opinion the marriage residence is not always the place of birth. Never forget Workhouse and overseers accounts records of birth

Offline BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,797
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Having difficulty with a 18th century marriage surname
« Reply #3 on: Yesterday at 12:24 »
Glad to have helped. 

We're not too bad, just getting older  :o

And you take care as well.   ;)
Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY

Offline Bookbox

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,397
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Having difficulty with a 18th century marriage surname
« Reply #4 on: Yesterday at 20:40 »
I would suggest Mawliverer. Maybe look at Mauleverer too.

Offline Top-of-the-hill

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,997
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Having difficulty with a 18th century marriage surname
« Reply #5 on: Yesterday at 21:32 »
  That would be my reading as well.
Pay, Kent
Codham/Coltham, Kent
Kent, Felton, Essex
Staples, Wiltshire

Offline dobfarm

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,036
  • Scarcliffe village Derbyshire
    • View Profile
Re: Having difficulty with a 18th century marriage surname
« Reply #6 on: Today at 00:24 »
Quote from: Bookbox on Yesterday at 20:40
I would suggest Mawliverer. Maybe look at Mauleverer too.

You are bang on correct! I have found Elizabeth Mauleverer baptism 1701 Selby Yorkshire

Thanks Bookbox and you Top of the hill.

 :)
In my opinion the marriage residence is not always the place of birth. Never forget Workhouse and overseers accounts records of birth
Pages: [1]