Author Topic: Royal Artillery Attestation c 1940  (Read 456 times)

Offline Pendlewitch67

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 911
    • View Profile
Royal Artillery Attestation c 1940
« on: Monday 15 September 25 20:24 BST (UK) »
Hi

Please could you help with a Royal Artillery attestation entry.

Under Transfers to other Corps or cause of becoming non-effective and record of re-enlistment (if any) (including date).

1.1.40 w res

Dis para 234 (11)  4 .5.53

Any help would be appreciated.

Thank you.

Kind regards
Amanda



Salkeld - Alston, Grassington, Earby, Burnley
Brotherton - Burnley, Barnoldswick
Layfield - Burnley
Child - Bradford
Payne - Poulton Le Fylde, Burnley, Brierfield
Harris - Castle Bytham, Nelson, Barrowford
Sage - Boxted, Langham, West Riding, Lancashire
Hastie - Lanarkshire
Gillon - Lanarkshire

Offline Andy J2022

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,249
    • View Profile
Re: Royal Artillery Attestation c 1940
« Reply #1 on: Monday 15 September 25 22:18 BST (UK) »
Class W Army Reserve was introduced in June 1916 by Army Order 203/16 and was "for all those soldiers whose services are deemed to be more valuable to the country in civil rather than military employment". I assume that it fulfilled the same purpose in WW2.

I cannot help with your other question. I suspect it relates to a specific paragraph in the Reserve Regulations concerning his final discharge having completed his reserve liability. Para 234 does not appear to be a reference to King's Regulations for the Army. In KRs 1940 discharges are covered in paragraph 390.

Offline Pendlewitch67

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 911
    • View Profile
Re: Royal Artillery Attestation c 1940
« Reply #2 on: Monday 15 September 25 23:24 BST (UK) »
Class W Army Reserve was introduced in June 1916 by Army Order 203/16 and was "for all those soldiers whose services are deemed to be more valuable to the country in civil rather than military employment". I assume that it fulfilled the same purpose in WW2.

I cannot help with your other question. I suspect it relates to a specific paragraph in the Reserve Regulations concerning his final discharge having completed his reserve liability. Para 234 does not appear to be a reference to King's Regulations for the Army. In KRs 1940 discharges are covered in paragraph 390.

Thank you.

All I know is that in 1935 he became a cabin boy and was listed as a merchant seamen on the Fresno City which was sunk in Nov 1940. It doesn't look as though he was on board when that happened if the date of 1.1.40 is correct.
Salkeld - Alston, Grassington, Earby, Burnley
Brotherton - Burnley, Barnoldswick
Layfield - Burnley
Child - Bradford
Payne - Poulton Le Fylde, Burnley, Brierfield
Harris - Castle Bytham, Nelson, Barrowford
Sage - Boxted, Langham, West Riding, Lancashire
Hastie - Lanarkshire
Gillon - Lanarkshire