Author Topic: Sending letters to unknown relatives  (Read 358 times)

Offline 4b2

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 207
    • View Profile
Sending letters to unknown relatives
« on: Yesterday at 13:00 »
Hello,

What has been the experience of RootsChatters in sending post, emails, Facebook messages etc. to unknown relatives? What is the response rate like? Any particularly frosty receptions?

When I first began in 2009-10, I did call two relatives, who were known to my father - close relatives. One was a little frosty, but willing and the other was quite open. I also visited one of my grandfather's cousins who first piqued my interest in genealogy at age six, when he showed me a photo of my great-great-grandparents and their children. But by this time he was senile.

I've long thought about finding all my closer cousins - 1st and 2nd of my parents, and just sending them all messages. It can't hurt - too much, and surely some gems will turn up.

I have just sent out my first letter to an unknown relative. She is the cousin of my grandmother (who was born out of wedlock). I've not mentioned this in my message. It could come up later. I've only just been able to seal my grandmother's paternal line. After years of waiting, finally a closer DNA match came up and I was able to finally pin point my grandmother's father.

Online Zaphod99

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 455
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Sending letters to unknown relatives
« Reply #1 on: Yesterday at 13:23 »
Be polite. Literate.  Friendly.  Perhaps joke about the strange idea of writing to someone you don't know.  Get a friend to read them first.  If you don't get a reply try again after 3 months. But stay polite.  We've had replies after 2 years, and once after 5 letters.  Some sites don't send notifications.  Don't just say "How are we related?". Prove you've done research.  Come across as an interesting cousin.  Tell the recipient about yourself.

Mrs Zaph

Offline chrissiecruiser

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 282
  • Dora Berg (12/5/1893-8/10/1916)
    • View Profile
Re: Sending letters to unknown relatives
« Reply #2 on: Yesterday at 13:28 »
Hello 4b2,
I have sent quite a few messages via Ancestry and had some lovely responses.
I discovered a branch of my maternal line this way and have now met them. Very exciting.
I think your wording is important, giving a little info makes people curious and they want to respond.
Cheers,
Chris
Berg - Uppsala, Sweden
Bissett - Scotland
Butler - Yorkshire
Butt - Dorset
Butterworth - Yorkshire
Cave - Somerset
Darby - Somerset
Grierson - Scotland
Kruger/Krueger - Prussia, Germany
Lecher - Cottbus, Brandenburg, Germany
Levick - Nottinghamshire, UK
Molde - Schleswig-Holstein, Denmark/Germany
Oram - Wiltshire & Somerset, UK
Randell - Devon, UK
Savren - Dorset, UK
Weilbach - Denmark & South Africa
Williams - Cornwall, UK

Online Zaphod99

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 455
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Sending letters to unknown relatives
« Reply #3 on: Yesterday at 13:45 »
One thing to remember is that many people get test kits as unwanted presents. And they do little more than add 4-5 immediate relatives to a tree to please the giver. And then never log in again.  If the profile says 'last logged in 3-11 months ago" don't be overly optimistic.

Mrs Zaph


Offline Jebber

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,716
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Sending letters to unknown relatives
« Reply #4 on: Yesterday at 13:50 »
If they are online it should be be quite easy. A brief introductory message explaining who you are and why you are contacting them usually results in a reply.

If contacting someone you know to be elderly a letter should be the way to go. Again, explaining why you are contacting them and of course it’s only polite to enclose a stamped and address envelope for their reply. If you don’t hear back they may be ill or have dementia you have no way of knowing.

I have been contacted by someone unconnected months after I wrote to a distant relative. The person who wrote back had found my letter when clearing the house of my relative who had died.
CHOULES All ,  COKER Harwich Essex & Rochester Kent 
COLE Gt. Oakley, & Lt. Oakley, Essex.
DUNCAN Kent
EVERITT Colchester,  Dovercourt & Harwich Essex
GULLIVER/GULLOFER Fifehead Magdalen Dorset
HORSCROFT Kent.
KING Sturminster Newton, Dorset. MONK Odiham Ham.
SCOTT Wrabness, Essex
WILKINS Stour Provost, Dorset.
WICKHAM All in North Essex.
WICKHAM Medway Towns, Kent from 1880
WICKHAM, Ipswich, Suffolk.

Offline Josephine

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,272
  • Photo: Beardstown, Illinois
    • View Profile
Re: Sending letters to unknown relatives
« Reply #5 on: Yesterday at 15:21 »
It's worth a try. As they say, nothing ventured, nothing gained.

A lot of people simply aren't interested in all that stuff, or they're too busy or sick, as others have pointed out, but once in a while you'll find someone who's happy to share and sometimes they might even stay in touch and become friends.

I'd say the majority of my inquiries have gone unanswered, for whatever reasons, but I have had some lovely responses from a few, and I've gained some good friends, too.
England: Barnett; Beaumont; Christy; George; Holland; Parker; Pope; Salisbury
Scotland: Currie; Curror; Dobson; Muir; Oliver; Pryde; Turnbull; Wilson
Ireland: Carson; Colbert; Coy; Craig; McGlinchey; Riley; Rooney; Trotter; Waters/Watters

Offline 4b2

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 207
    • View Profile
Re: Sending letters to unknown relatives
« Reply #6 on: Yesterday at 19:17 »
Thanks for the replies. To make it more clear, I was referring to contacting people who are not on Ancestry. So you find they are a close relative, find their contact details, and send them a letter, Facebook message, phone call etc.

I didn't think about sending a self addresses envelope. It seems a good idea, esp. as the price of stamps is a lot higher than it was a few years ago. Though I think most people have access to email or something now.

The person I sent a letter to is 92. But it seems they are probably in good health as there is a post from last year mentioning they have tended the parish church grounds for decades.

I also don't live in the UK, but I found this service, which you can send a letter in the UK from online. It's about £2 as a base cost.

https://modernmail.co.uk

Offline Biggles50

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,518
    • View Profile
Re: Sending letters to unknown relatives
« Reply #7 on: Yesterday at 21:19 »
Via this very forum I found two first Cousins in Australia, a member in Sydney looked them up for me.

A speculative eMail to a company in Canada elicited a response from a Second Cousin who introduced me to four more Second Cousins and we are now Facebook friends and email regularly.

Via Facebook I found a Third Cousin who just happened to be a Facebook friend of my Wife.

Speculative letters to three very close relatives got a response from a person who I thought may be my Half Brother, from him I found his Sister and DNA confirmed that they are my Half Siblings.

Ancestry messages has me linking to about 50 distant Cousins.

My Heritage and ftDNA messages linked me to three Third Cousins, two of which are Half Siblings to each other and this helped me solve a DNA puzzle.

My Wife has about 20 distant Cousins who have responded to Ancestry messages and some are now her Facebook friends.

So yes, it can and may work.

We found that the sensitive approach with just enough information to spark interest generates a response.

Offline Jackiemh

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 497
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Sending letters to unknown relatives
« Reply #8 on: Yesterday at 21:22 »
Hello
I have written to unknown relatives, by mail, and got replies from most of them whereas when I have contacted them through family history sites, I have got few responses.
I start by writing a draft letter stating who I am, why I am contacting them and how I think we are related. I include several questions without going into too much detail. After several days, I refine the letter and send it off.
I have been lucky in the replies as sometimes the connection has been tenuous. I haven't included a stamped addressed envelope to date but I did consider it.
Nothing ventured is nothing gained.
Good luck with your research.
Jackie
Bateman, Baylis, Bellotti, Boag, Bower (Stillgebauer), Cattermole, Chester, Dullage, Felix, French, Fursse, Garrett, Gilbert, Harding, Haynes, Hazelwood, Plume, Putland, Rudge, Strickson, Vine, Warren, Whitehead, Whitehorn, Wiltshire, Youthed and many more