Author Topic: Charged with concealing a birth  (Read 344 times)

Offline Norfolk Nan

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 355
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Charged with concealing a birth
« on: Sunday 17 August 25 13:43 BST (UK) »


One of mine was charged at Gloucester in 1847 for concealing a birth - the outcome was 'no bill' which I think means not enough evidence to continue with a trial. 

Would this charge apply for not registering a birth? I ask because I know there was an illegitimate birth in 1842, a baptism took place, but I haven't found a birth certificate.  If not, I assume this charge relates to another birth. 

And, how might I find out more about this charge?

Thank you.
Davison - London
South - London, Hampshire
Sharp(e) - Hertfordshire, Suffolk
Lee - Ireland, London
Edwards - Wiltshire, London
Bickers - London, Norfolk, Suffolk
Murray - London

Online BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,767
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Charged with concealing a birth
« Reply #1 on: Sunday 17 August 25 14:24 BST (UK) »
Compulsory registration of births, marriages and deaths was initiated 1 January 1875 - England and Wales.



Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY

Offline Milliepede

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 16,247
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Charged with concealing a birth
« Reply #2 on: Sunday 17 August 25 14:26 BST (UK) »
Both children from the same mother?  Was the 1847 birth not registered either?
Hinchliffe - Huddersfield Wiltshire
Burroughs - Arlingham Glos
Pick - Frocester Glos

Offline Jebber

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,718
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Charged with concealing a birth
« Reply #3 on: Sunday 17 August 25 14:54 BST (UK) »
At the time of the 1836 Act the onus was on the Registrar to locate and register the births, many births went unregistered. From 1875 it was the responsibility of the parents to ensure births were registered.

From the  1847 date you quote it sounds most likely the birth was concealed, possibly because the infant did not survive. Have you found a death or  a surviving child of a likely age after 1847?

You do not mention how you know about the charge of concealment of a birth, if not from a newspaper report then that would be the way to look further.
CHOULES All ,  COKER Harwich Essex & Rochester Kent 
COLE Gt. Oakley, & Lt. Oakley, Essex.
DUNCAN Kent
EVERITT Colchester,  Dovercourt & Harwich Essex
GULLIVER/GULLOFER Fifehead Magdalen Dorset
HORSCROFT Kent.
KING Sturminster Newton, Dorset. MONK Odiham Ham.
SCOTT Wrabness, Essex
WILKINS Stour Provost, Dorset.
WICKHAM All in North Essex.
WICKHAM Medway Towns, Kent from 1880
WICKHAM, Ipswich, Suffolk.


Online JenB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,414
    • View Profile
Re: Charged with concealing a birth
« Reply #4 on: Sunday 17 August 25 15:03 BST (UK) »
Compulsory registration of births, marriages and deaths was initiated 1 January 1875 - England and Wales.

Registration was intended to be compulsory from 1837 onwards. See our knowledgeable friend AntonyMMM on the subject here https://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=869240.msg7401378#msg7401378 and here https://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=840047.msg7059839#msg7059839
All Census Look Ups Are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Online BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,767
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Charged with concealing a birth
« Reply #5 on: Sunday 17 August 25 15:09 BST (UK) »
Yes, I have seen the responses from AntonyMMM.  :-X :-X
Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY

Offline Norfolk Nan

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 355
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Charged with concealing a birth
« Reply #6 on: Sunday 17 August 25 15:20 BST (UK) »


Thanks all.  I knew registration was a bit relaxed in the early days but I've got a few that are missing way past the Bill. What I've read suggests a link to miscarriage and infanticide - I hope it was neither in this case.   

This ancestor had four known illegitimate births, all different fathers as far as I can tell, but not one in or around 1847 (1840, 1842, 1852 and 1854) so I'm baffled.  I found it in the actual criminal register but aside from the charge and the outcome, no details are given.  I'll need to look for a newspaper report or other court docs. 

Thank you.
Davison - London
South - London, Hampshire
Sharp(e) - Hertfordshire, Suffolk
Lee - Ireland, London
Edwards - Wiltshire, London
Bickers - London, Norfolk, Suffolk
Murray - London

Offline Norfolk Nan

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 355
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Charged with concealing a birth
« Reply #7 on: Sunday 17 August 25 15:53 BST (UK) »

An update -

It appears my ancestor was charged on 19th April 1847 by the oath of a William Bennett and others, of having concealed the birth of a female child on 10th April 1847.  She was kept in jail until her case in August when, by proclamation, there was 'no bill' so no case to answer, and allowed free. I've no idea what happened to the child or who William Bennett was.  She's working as a cook in the town in 1851 but is elsewhere in 1852 having another child.   
Davison - London
South - London, Hampshire
Sharp(e) - Hertfordshire, Suffolk
Lee - Ireland, London
Edwards - Wiltshire, London
Bickers - London, Norfolk, Suffolk
Murray - London

Offline RJ_Paton

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,621
  • Cuimhnichibh air na daoine bho'n d'thainig sibh
    • View Profile
Re: Charged with concealing a birth
« Reply #8 on: Sunday 17 August 25 22:02 BST (UK) »
Concealment of a pregnancy and the subsequent birth and death of the child was a criminal offence first enacted according to a research paper I've read around 1803  in England & wales (1809 in Scotland). Primarily aimed at unmarried women it was later reinforced in England Wales and written into The Offences against the Person Act of 1861.

There are several scenarios which could lead to the lack of any procedure
1. The child lived
2. The woman had informed someone she was pregnant
3. At the time of Birth the woman had called for assistance.

Added: It was not linked to a failure to register the Birth but was a crime in its own right.