Author Topic: Sarah Elizabeth Dixon Hayton, Cumberland  (Read 141 times)

Offline dippitybix

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 206
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Sarah Elizabeth Dixon Hayton, Cumberland
« on: Sunday 03 August 25 12:58 BST (UK) »
Hello all,

I'm trying to determine if I'm on the right track into my 2x great aunt Sarah Elizabeth Dixon.

Sarah was one of 5 illegitimate children born to my 3x great grandmother Jane Dixon who herself is a bit of a mystery.

The rest of the siblings that I know of were

James Dixon born 1856 Hayton
Mary Jane Dixon born 1859 Hayton
Margaret Ann Dixon born 1868
John Dixon born 1872

I think I have found Jane on the 1881 census but this time she is going by the surname of Hogson and she's living with her son John Dixon who is 9 years old, she's stating she is married but I have found no records to say she was.

Sarah Elizabeth Dixon was born 21st March 1863 Fenton, Hayton, Cumberland.
I found her living with her grandfather and mother in the 1871 and in 1881 she is living with her Aunt Mary Little nee Dixon.

There is a marriage certificate on ancestry for a Sarah Elizabeth Dixon and George Ogle Gray in Staines. She gives her father as John Dixon shoe maker but we don't know who her father actually was. Her grandad was John Dixon but he was a labourer.

https://www.rootschat.com/links/01twk/

The 1939 register has that Sarah Elizabeth with a birth date of 2 March 1862. The other census records has Sarah Elizabeth with birthplace Brampton or Carlisle and the same year of birth. I notice in the 1911 census the couple have named one of their daughters Mary Jane (and two sons John and James) - could be after her sister and brothers. Her sister Mary Jane Dixon married Thomas Maclagan - they actually also married in London as Thomas was a house painter.

Many thanks for any help provided.

Offline Milliepede

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 16,210
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Sarah Elizabeth Dixon Hayton, Cumberland
« Reply #1 on: Sunday 03 August 25 13:33 BST (UK) »
Does her sister name a father when she marries?  **

Where are Jane’s other children in 1861/1871? 

** father John Dixon farmer
Hinchliffe - Huddersfield Wiltshire
Burroughs - Arlingham Glos
Pick - Frocester Glos

Offline dippitybix

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 206
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Sarah Elizabeth Dixon Hayton, Cumberland
« Reply #2 on: Sunday 03 August 25 13:48 BST (UK) »
Does her sister name a father when she marries?  **

Where are Jane’s other children in 1861/1871? 

** father John Dixon farmer

James is with his grandparents John and Mary in 1861, and in 1871 is a Servant in Walton Low, Cumberland.

Mary Jane is also with her grandparents in 1861 and in 1871 she is still living with grandparents and sisters Margaret and Mary Jane.

John I believe is with his mother in 1881 as mentioned above.

Offline Milliepede

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 16,210
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Sarah Elizabeth Dixon Hayton, Cumberland
« Reply #3 on: Sunday 03 August 25 15:03 BST (UK) »
Just to add the marriage you mention for Mary Jane just has Mary on the marriage certificate.

The hints on ancestry point to a Mary Jane Dixon marriage to Samuel Blakeney in 1882 Cockermouth district. 

So has this marriage been ruled out in favour of the one in London to Thomas Maclagan?
Hinchliffe - Huddersfield Wiltshire
Burroughs - Arlingham Glos
Pick - Frocester Glos


Offline dippitybix

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 206
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Sarah Elizabeth Dixon Hayton, Cumberland
« Reply #4 on: Sunday 03 August 25 15:08 BST (UK) »
Just to add the marriage you mention for Mary Jane just has Mary on the marriage certificate.

The hints on ancestry point to a Mary Jane Dixon marriage to Samuel Blakeney in 1882 Cockermouth district. 

So has this marriage been ruled out in favour of the one in London to Thomas Maclagan?

Yes, the Thomas Maclagan marriage is definitely correct.

Mary Jane was a domestic servant in 1881 12 Argyle Street Westminster - same address as her residence on the marriage certificate.

Offline Milliepede

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 16,210
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Sarah Elizabeth Dixon Hayton, Cumberland
« Reply #5 on: Sunday 03 August 25 15:10 BST (UK) »
Great thanks just wanted to be sure.
Hinchliffe - Huddersfield Wiltshire
Burroughs - Arlingham Glos
Pick - Frocester Glos

Offline Milliepede

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 16,210
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Sarah Elizabeth Dixon Hayton, Cumberland
« Reply #6 on: Sunday 03 August 25 15:24 BST (UK) »

Quote
I think I have found Jane on the 1881 census but this time she is going by the surname of Hogson

Am not finding that record - what age and birthplace does she have so I can search again?
Hinchliffe - Huddersfield Wiltshire
Burroughs - Arlingham Glos
Pick - Frocester Glos

Offline Milliepede

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 16,210
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Sarah Elizabeth Dixon Hayton, Cumberland
« Reply #7 on: Sunday 03 August 25 15:28 BST (UK) »
Is this marriage any use?

Jane Dixon
William Hodgson

Jun 1875 Tynemouth
Hinchliffe - Huddersfield Wiltshire
Burroughs - Arlingham Glos
Pick - Frocester Glos

Online softly softly

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,164
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Sarah Elizabeth Dixon Hayton, Cumberland
« Reply #8 on: Sunday 03 August 25 15:30 BST (UK) »

Quote
I think I have found Jane on the 1881 census but this time she is going by the surname of Hogson

Am not finding that record - what age and birthplace does she have so I can search again?

Piece   5148
Folio   42
Page number   3

SS