Rowe on census 1891

[sigrid7]

Thanks very muchfor all your replies and the extra information regarding the baptisms, that is fantastic to have! I think they were still in Surrey for 1891, so why aren't they there? Yes, I am coming back to this query, and had an address of Pine Grove. If they are on the 1891 they must be terribly mistranscribed. 

[Ladyhawk]

I must admit that I spent hours searching   for the family and ended up getting Horace's birth cert image which was for Sept 1891.  The address was Pine Grove, Weybridge, Surrey and his father was a domestic coachman - which  didn't help much 

Kay

Kay - I’ve spent sometime again looking with loads of different variables to see if I could find the family in 1891 but they are very elusive indeed 
That was really nice of you to purchase the digital image of Horace’s birth to give their address - were they just missed off I wonder 

This should be the family
Robert Law born c1853 Kelsall occ coachman
Sarah Anne born c1855 London
Ethel born c1887 Guildford
Mabel born c 1886 Guildford
Eveline born c1889 Guildford
Mary Elizabeth born c1890 >>>>bpt Weybridge father occ coachman

Horace born c1891  >>>>bpt. Weybridge Father occ coachman>>>b/c abode Pine Street
Muriel born c1893 >>>>bpt Kelsall father occ green grocer
Robert Hedley born c1895>>>>bpt Kelsall father occ green grocer
All have either mmn Gurrey/Gurney on GRO
Robert LAW 30, occ coachman  & Sarah Ann GURNEY married 1885

Marriage 2 Oct 1915 Kelsall, St. Philip
Eveline Law 25 Father   Robert Law, occ gardener
Spouse   Ellis Walker
One witness Mary Elizabeth Law
https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/233902526/eveline-walker

Marriage 8 Jun 1922 Altrincham, St. John the Evangelist
Muriel Law 26 Father   Robert Law occ gardener
Spouse   William Chaddock
One witness Mary Elizabeth Law

Marriage 22 Jul 1924 Kelsall, St. Philip
Robert Hedley Law 29, grocer’s assistant Father Robert Law occ gardener
Spouse   Mabel Emily Pine
Three witnesses, 2 were Mary Elizabeth Law & Robert Law

[Kay99]

I agree that the family were missed off from the census.   They were possibly moving at the time of the census or simply away.   Have looked through most of the images and the enumerators writing is fairly good so sadly don't think they were mistranscribed 

[sigrid7]

I've been going over all the details you have all found, and thank you so much Kay99, especially for purchasing the digital image, I never expected that and also for going through the images and Ladyhawk, Millipede, Rosie99 and Terri Ann for all your time and help.  They must have been moving, as advised by Kay99, as I noticed addresses were Pine grove and also Pine street so I am thinking they were two separate addresses. Thanks so very much for all your replies, it is much appreciated. I think this one has been 'solved' thanks to your help, input and advice. I will be going over all the info you have all supplied again and will be noting it
down.