Author Topic: Children of Thomas and Rose Peck  (Read 379 times)

Offline LizzieL

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 9,072
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Children of Thomas and Rose Peck
« Reply #9 on: Thursday 12 June 25 07:51 BST (UK) »
I believe they misunderstood the question in 1911.

I can put together 8 children

Thomas Bertie born 8 September 1894  (St Thomas ( Peacock Yard)
William  born 19 February 1896             (St Thomas  9 Peacock yard) 
Frederick John born 1 January 1898     - St Ebbe  5 Twinings? Yard - Dies 1980 as                             Frederick George Peck same DOB.
Birth reg as George John 1898 mmn Alton

Gertrude Alice  reg 1900 ADDED born 20 May 1900 bap St Ebbe - 5 Godfrey's Yard
Berty reg 1902       ---- 24 March 1902- 1957 Rose Hill Cemetery -son of Thomas and Rose
Florence reg. 1904 - ADDED born 1 April 1904, St Ebbe - 5 Godfrey's Yard
Solomon John  reg. 1906  born/bap Solomon Jack  4 October 1906 - 5 Godfrey's Yard
William   bap 16 May 1911 --  buried 1 June 1911 of 58 High Street
Should he be one month and not 11 months in 1911???

Based on a child every 2 years there is one missing 1908.

They go on to have
Emily Matilda  born 13 February 1912  - 58 High Street ADDED buried 20 October 1913 age 20 months  - 58 High Street. St Thomas
Harry  reg. 1915

Thanks. That's the same set that I've got. The Frederick / George/ John child was probably the Wm John in 1901 census.
Although a gap in children about 1908, I wouldn't be surprised if there wasn't a 9th child and it was just a case of their inability to count.
Berks / Oxon: Eltham, Annetts, Wiltshire (surname not county), Hawkins, Pembroke, Partridge
Dorset / Hants: Derham, Stride, Purkiss, Sibley
Yorkshire: Pottage, Carr, Blackburn, Depledge
Sussex: Goodyer, Christopher, Trevatt
Lanark: Scott (soldier went to Jersey CI)
Jersey: Fowler, Huelin, Scott

Offline Mabel Bagshawe

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,565
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Children of Thomas and Rose Peck
« Reply #10 on: Thursday 12 June 25 21:10 BST (UK) »
Unless there was a stillbirth, or birth and death in very short succession which they didn't bother to register

But they included in the total in 1911