« Reply #12 on: Saturday 24 May 25 13:53 BST (UK) »
I think Ancestry transcribers often have to do what those at the top tell them, such as a member on here once explained about banns records on Ancestry having to be put down as a "marriage" record, hence why you may see many banns records as marriages. Banns records can be great, and while you may not always find a marriage, a banns record may be found that shows the couple did intend to marry. My widowed ancestor had her banns read in July 1834 in Marylebone but not marriage has ever been found yet she took his surname.
Researching:
LONDON, Coombs, Roberts, Auber, Helsdon, Fradine, Morin, Goodacre
DORSET Coombs, Munday
NORFOLK Helsdon, Riches, Harbord, Budery
KENT Roberts, Goodacre
SUSSEX Walder, Boniface, Dinnage, Standen, Lee, Botten, Wickham, Jupp
SUFFOLK Titshall, Frost, Fairweather, Mayhew, Archer, Eade, Scarfe
DURHAM Stewart, Musgrave, Wilson, Forster
SCOTLAND Stewart in Selkirk
USA Musgrave, Saix
ESSEX Cornwell, Stock, Quilter, Lawrence, Whale, Clift
OXON Edgington, Smith, Inkpen, Snell, Batten, Brain