Unfound Tuppenney/Tuppeny marriage

[softly softly]

It seems Elizabeth's birth is not recorded on GRO. Her mmn was Maunder. She was baptised 29th September 1844, parents Thomas & Jane. In 1851 she is with her grandmother Sarah Maunder.

SS

[chempat]

I did it from the GRO like you did the other one, was too inquisitive not to! 

Thank-you.

[chempat]

17 Dartmoor Street in 1871 - 3 separate households:

FindMyPast:
https://search.findmypast.co.uk/record/browse?id=gbc%2f1871%2f0033%2f0152

Ancestry:
http://www.rootschat.com/links/01tr1/

[wilcoxon]

It seems Elizabeth's birth is not recorded on GRO. Her mmn was Maunder. She was baptised 29th September 1844, parents Thomas & Jane. In 1851 she is with her grandmother Sarah Maunder.

SS

Not much help but ......

This looks like Sarah Maunder in 1841 before Elizabeth was born. As Mannan.
No Jane.
There is a Thomas Edgington 20 below the family. Born Y.

George Mannan56
Sarah Mannan56
John Mannan30
Thomas Mannan20
Sarah Mannan15


https://www.ancestry.co.uk/search/collections/8978/records/1916385

[wilcoxon]

1871 census for I believe Elizabeth's parents, Jane appears to be a little old to have a son born 1868.

Piece   2648
Folio   119
Page number   7
Household Members (Name)   Age   Relationship
Thos Edgington 53 Head
Jane Edgington   53   Wife
George Edgington 22 Son
Richd Edgington 3 Son  born LONDON
Thos Moss 15 Lodger

SS

added, in 1881 Richard recorded as grandson.

added, when Richard married in 1897 he did not record a father.

Could this be Richard

NameRichard EdgingtonGenderMaleArrival Age53
Record TypeArrivalBirth Dateabt 1867Birth PlaceFairford Gloucester, England
Arrival Date23 Mar 1920Port of ArrivalBuffalo, New York, USAMotherElizabeth
Relative NameEmily StevensRelative RelationshipSister-in-law

The surname of Elizabeth isn't transcribed but looks like Smith.  Cirencester.
Emily Stevens address is Argyle Pk Buffalo

https://www.ancestry.co.uk/search/collections/1075/records/5551065

US Border crossings

[Milliepede]

Yes I thought that was probably Richard too.  Elizabeth Smith would be correct for mother.

[softly softly]

In the seeming absence of a marriage I wonder if the gentleman in the attached 1871 census might have been the father. Was he a letter carrier in London? who knows. He does go on to marry and have a family and died 1906.




https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VF6L-359?lang=en

SS

[Milliepede]

Well it’s as good a candidate as any and he could certainly have travelled to London and back with that occupation.  Would be more plausible to father one child but with two they would have to meet up again or he stayed wherever she was residing. 

Does the Tuppenney name appear in any newspaper articles or trade directories for the time? 

Also the burial for the little Clara that died, would that have any clues to the parents. 

[wilcoxon]

Yes I thought that was probably Richard too.  Elizabeth Smith would be correct for mother.

Richard married Annie Elizabeth Stevens .