I do firmly believe that abilities in areas like music and Art/Design can persist through families. My mother was a talented and skillful painter of flowers, mainly watercolour, and immediately prior to WW2 she went to Art College. I used to assume that all adults could "see" and draw whatever they wanted, and it was a surprise to me that my first teachers, when I started school, couldn't do this. I'd been brought up to use a range of Art materials confidently, and to see properly as a start to be able to depict. To judge by the pictures I'd done as a child, that my mother kept, this was done very competently from an early age. Apart from genteel drawing and sketching ladies, we've found little more on the maternal side.
My grandfather on the paternal side was a himself talented and able painter of largely architectural subjects, and, as part of a family firm, did large murals in hotels and theatre. I have also found when I started researching family history that a Mr Toplis, of Sark, an artist, amongst relatives on my paternal great grandmother's ancestry was quite well-known, and many others seem to have been sufficiently talented to be of note. Skilled cabinet makers also featured in my paternal grandfather's relatives and ancestors. My own first degree subject was Graphic Design, and I have a range of design skills used throughout my own working life.
I can agree that the environment a person is brought up in encourages the development of such skills - but there does have to be some native ability there, no matter how latent.
On the other hand, on both sides of my ancestry there is evidence of a range of musical abilities, from church organists to band and orchestral performers, - but despite slogging through years oif piano lessons, and being a competent choir person at need, quite good at sight reading, I'm the non-musical one, really.
And although my mother was an excellent cook, I've always been hopeless ( no proper sense of smell, my OH says)
TY