Author Topic: Ancestry Tree Rating  (Read 3015 times)

Offline warncoort

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,782
  • James Edward Butcher, son John William 1925
    • View Profile
Ancestry Tree Rating
« on: Wednesday 29 January 25 00:19 GMT (UK) »
Apologies in advance if this post offends any users.
I have just noticed that Ancestry are now rating users tree,mine being 9.5 but no indication if this is a percentage or what.
Maybe users can now start rating Ancestry's performance,though knowing their dislike for anyone questioning them,posts would probably be deleted.
Butcher Westmorland and Lancashire
Barton Westmorland and Yorkshire
Trethowan,Reeves Middlesex
Halsall,Green,Charters,Chatterton Lancashire
Smith, Moger, Maxfield Wiltshire
Woods,Speechley and Coles Huntingdonshire
Gibson,Blanks,Monk,Fokes Essex

Offline Ruskie

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 26,276
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry Tree Rating
« Reply #1 on: Wednesday 29 January 25 01:53 GMT (UK) »
I can’t see anything whatsoever to be offended by in your question.  :)
 
The first I heard about this rating system was a couple of days ago when someone mentioned that their tree was rated quite low. I think they hadn’t bothered putting in birth or death dates or something like that. I must say I wouldn’t trust any of these automated, guesstimated, calculated, algorithmic estimated carrots put out by Ancestry.

I’m sure you are right - the rating would be very low if users were able to rank Ancestry.

I haven’t checked my tree yet, but I’m not paying Ancestry at the moment so they might have removed my tree or maybe only showing me three generations, or three people with the rest behind a pay wall.  ;D

Offline macwil

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 430
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry Tree Rating
« Reply #2 on: Wednesday 29 January 25 03:20 GMT (UK) »
I'm not subscribed either but I can see all of my tree but not view their sources.
I can't find any rating on it but then I do have it as private.
Active links are now (after 13/04/2018) indicated by bold red italics. Just click on them.
The only stupid question is the one not asked

WILSON; Lancs, Lanrks.
BERRY; Lancs.
BORASTON; Salop, Worcs,
TYLER; Salop, Herefords.

Offline Ruskie

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 26,276
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry Tree Rating
« Reply #3 on: Wednesday 29 January 25 03:29 GMT (UK) »
I was just on Ancestry now trying to find my rating. It must be hidden somewhere, or maybe only subscribers can see it.

(I was sort of joking about them not letting me view my whole tree, due to “included” features dwindling.)  :)


Offline macwil

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 430
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry Tree Rating
« Reply #4 on: Wednesday 29 January 25 03:32 GMT (UK) »
Ah! I missed ;D.
Active links are now (after 13/04/2018) indicated by bold red italics. Just click on them.
The only stupid question is the one not asked

WILSON; Lancs, Lanrks.
BERRY; Lancs.
BORASTON; Salop, Worcs,
TYLER; Salop, Herefords.

Offline DavidG02

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,124
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry Tree Rating
« Reply #5 on: Wednesday 29 January 25 04:09 GMT (UK) »
That was indeed me hinted at by Ruskie above

It only appears when you open a tree on the activity bar ie : Activity : Invite: Find A Tree

Its an opt-in to ''help you with your tree '' ie tidy up the duplicates and point out the issues with your tree

6.6 Fair
You have 4744 possible errors in your tree.
64 Possible duplicates
14 Only tree documentation
4664 No documentation
2 Other possible errors

As noted the 4664 No Docs would be 3rd cousins spouses etc where dates havent been entered

1. Its a money spinner at $XX per month
2. Again its you the purchaser doing their work to provide them with more hints

And yes I know I have errors in my tree but I dont care - its my tree

Genealogy-Its a family thing

Paternal: Gibbins,McNamara, Jenkins, Schumann,  Inwood, Sheehan, Quinlan, Tierney, Cole

Maternal: Munn, Simpson , Brighton, Clayfield, Westmacott, Corbell, Hatherell, Blacksell/Blackstone, Boothey , Muirhead

Son: Bull, Kneebone, Lehmann, Cronin, Fowler, Yates, Biglands, Rix, Carpenter, Pethick, Carrick, Male, London, Jacka, Tilbrook, Scott, Hampshire, Buckley

Brickwalls-   Schumann, Simpson,Westmacott/Wennicot
Scott, Cronin
Gedmatch Kit : T812072

Offline Wexflyer

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,216
  • Not Crown Copyright
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry Tree Rating
« Reply #6 on: Wednesday 29 January 25 04:35 GMT (UK) »
Is this a "Pro Tool"?
BRENNANx2 Davidstown&Taghmon,Ballybrennan; COOPER St.Helens;CREAN Raheennaskeagh&Ballywalter;COSGRAVE Castlebridge?;CULLEN Lady's Island;CULLETON Forth Commons;CURRAN Hillbrook, Wic;DOYLE Clonee&Tombrack;FOX Knockbrandon; FURLONG Moortown;HAYESx2 Walsheslough&Wex;McGILL Litter;MORRIS Forth Commons;PIERCE Ladys Island;POTTS Bennettstown;REDMOND Gerry; ROCHEx2 Wex; ROCHFORD Ballysampson&Ballyhit;SHERIDAN Moneydurtlow; SINNOTT Wex;SMYTH Gerry&Oulart;WALSH Kilrane&Wex; WHITE Tagoat area

Offline DavidG02

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,124
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry Tree Rating
« Reply #7 on: Wednesday 29 January 25 05:03 GMT (UK) »
Genealogy-Its a family thing

Paternal: Gibbins,McNamara, Jenkins, Schumann,  Inwood, Sheehan, Quinlan, Tierney, Cole

Maternal: Munn, Simpson , Brighton, Clayfield, Westmacott, Corbell, Hatherell, Blacksell/Blackstone, Boothey , Muirhead

Son: Bull, Kneebone, Lehmann, Cronin, Fowler, Yates, Biglands, Rix, Carpenter, Pethick, Carrick, Male, London, Jacka, Tilbrook, Scott, Hampshire, Buckley

Brickwalls-   Schumann, Simpson,Westmacott/Wennicot
Scott, Cronin
Gedmatch Kit : T812072

Offline MollyC

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 613
  • Preserving the past for the future
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry Tree Rating
« Reply #8 on: Wednesday 29 January 25 08:28 GMT (UK) »
I notice Familysearch is now using a Data Quality Rating on some records, which is explained in this article dated 27 Nov 2024.
https://www.familysearch.org/en/help/helpcenter/article/data-quality-rating
Perhaps it is something similar.
Feedback is invited.