Author Topic: Are Anc*stry "Traits" as Totally Useless as I Think They Are?  (Read 2024 times)

Online Glen in Tinsel Kni

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,461
  • Scottish Borders
    • View Profile
Re: Are Anc*stry "Traits" as Totally Useless as I Think They Are?
« Reply #18 on: Saturday 15 February 25 19:35 GMT (UK) »
I've just found one that says my 'DNA suggests you have attached earlobes'. So glad to resolve that non existent 50 something year conundrum I've never had.

Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,896
    • View Profile
Re: Are Anc*stry "Traits" as Totally Useless as I Think They Are?
« Reply #19 on: Saturday 15 February 25 20:00 GMT (UK) »
That's one of the few traits that Ancestry has got correct for me  ::)
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***

https://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=877762.0

Offline Jebber

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,690
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Are Anc*stry "Traits" as Totally Useless as I Think They Are?
« Reply #20 on: Saturday 15 February 25 20:44 GMT (UK) »
Watched a programme on TV this afternoon, Sarah Beeny and her husband got their DNA  results and were getting all excited about their ethnicity. It made me laugh because we now how it will keep changing. ;D ;D
CHOULES All ,  COKER Harwich Essex & Rochester Kent 
COLE Gt. Oakley, & Lt. Oakley, Essex.
DUNCAN Kent
EVERITT Colchester,  Dovercourt & Harwich Essex
GULLIVER/GULLOFER Fifehead Magdalen Dorset
HORSCROFT Kent.
KING Sturminster Newton, Dorset. MONK Odiham Ham.
SCOTT Wrabness, Essex
WILKINS Stour Provost, Dorset.
WICKHAM All in North Essex.
WICKHAM Medway Towns, Kent from 1880
WICKHAM, Ipswich, Suffolk.

Online frostyknight

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 345
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Are Anc*stry "Traits" as Totally Useless as I Think They Are?
« Reply #21 on: Wednesday 19 February 25 22:45 GMT (UK) »
Well, they got one of my traits right... they said I was a night owl. Since I've rarely checked my Ancestry account before 9pm, they'd never be able to guess that. Would they?  ;D ;D


Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,896
    • View Profile
Re: Are Anc*stry "Traits" as Totally Useless as I Think They Are?
« Reply #22 on: Wednesday 19 February 25 23:38 GMT (UK) »
That's one of the few traits that Ancestry has got correct for me  ::)

Just glanced at my avatar and see that my Gran had attached lobes, so I must have inherited them from her along with her hair and eye colour. She was lovely  :)
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***

https://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=877762.0

Online Glen in Tinsel Kni

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,461
  • Scottish Borders
    • View Profile
Re: Are Anc*stry "Traits" as Totally Useless as I Think They Are?
« Reply #23 on: Thursday 20 February 25 00:52 GMT (UK) »
Now I think of it the attached earlobes thing is all the proof I need I'm not related to Vincent van Gogh.

As a whopping 2lb 5oz at birth I'm a little surprised they think I was above average birth weight. Maybe they mixed my dna in amongst the pet dna results for that one as I accept I was a tad heavy for a Jack Russell.  The jury is out on being more ticklish than average as I have no idea what average is or how to test for it.

Offline Pennines

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,929
    • View Profile
Re: Are Anc*stry "Traits" as Totally Useless as I Think They Are?
« Reply #24 on: Thursday 20 February 25 09:10 GMT (UK) »
Oh Glen - that is so funny!!

Actually, I didn't know there was a possibility of having 'detached' earlobes! Unless I just don't know anyone who has those.
Places of interest;
Lancashire, West Yorkshire, Southern Ireland, Scotland.

Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,896
    • View Profile
Re: Are Anc*stry "Traits" as Totally Useless as I Think They Are?
« Reply #25 on: Thursday 20 February 25 09:18 GMT (UK) »
'detached' is just the lobe, Pennines. The rest of the external ear is stuck to your head.   ;D ;D ;D

It's those of us with attached ones that are  posh - I think it's recessive - Glen would know.

 8) 8) 8)
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***

https://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=877762.0

Offline Pennines

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,929
    • View Profile
Re: Are Anc*stry "Traits" as Totally Useless as I Think They Are?
« Reply #26 on: Thursday 20 February 25 10:43 GMT (UK) »
Yes, Gadget -- but does the lobe just hang loose and flap about in the wind?
Places of interest;
Lancashire, West Yorkshire, Southern Ireland, Scotland.