Author Topic: James Armstrong Blakely, born 1851 Clones  (Read 1567 times)

Online heywood

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 42,567
    • View Profile
Re: James Armstrong Blakely, born 1851 Clones
« Reply #9 on: Monday 13 January 25 17:27 GMT (UK) »
Thank you. That is what i was referring to earlier re the family tree.
Apologies too as the ‘illegitimate’ note is the entry below.

I saw the marriage as ‘Rafe’ but that transcription is Ralph - often pronounced ‘Rafe’.
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline RosemaryJoan

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,203
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: James Armstrong Blakely, born 1851 Clones
« Reply #10 on: Monday 13 January 25 17:41 GMT (UK) »
Hello everybody. I am going to give up on James Armstrong Blakely as he was only of passing interest. All Sarah Jane’s record has been discussed in full on the Belfast Forum, so thanks to all of you for your time. Rosemary
Cully, Bannister, McConnell, Wallace (Co. Armagh)  Anderson, Ross (Co. Antrim), Gray, Truesdale (Co. Down)
McCormick (Killyleagh and finally Belfast)

Offline mindfulroz

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 47
    • View Profile
Re: James Armstrong Blakely, born 1851 Clones
« Reply #11 on: Monday 01 September 25 08:20 BST (UK) »
Hi
More about reliability of sources than the apecific topic. Wikitree tends to be more reliable that eg Ancestry, as you have to have at least 1 source of evidence to enter a profile, and other people can and do make/suggest chnages if it look like it doesn't"stack up" Find a Grave is variable - it's the boigraphy details and sometimes inter-linking of grave memorials to other family members that can be dodgy. I've taken to suggesting bio details where I know those to be accurate to memorials with no bios or changing those which I know are in accurate.