Author Topic: family search website - reliable?  (Read 2370 times)

Offline JEL93

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 21
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
family search website - reliable?
« on: Sunday 15 December 24 22:48 GMT (UK) »
Im just wondering
is family search reliable?
I can see my family on there,
but the records/family trees on family search dont make sense - ive seen it cited it everywhere though when i search.
is it a case that this website is just like ancestry where nearly everyones tree, is wrong?




Online Erato

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,903
  • Old Powder House, 1703
    • View Profile
Re: family search website - reliable?
« Reply #1 on: Sunday 15 December 24 23:08 GMT (UK) »
The value of FamilySearch isn't the trees, it's the huge number of records, especially for the United States.
Wiltshire:  Banks, Taylor
Somerset:  Duddridge, Richards, Barnard, Pillinger
Gloucestershire:  Barnard, Marsh, Crossman
Bristol:  Banks, Duddridge, Barnard
Down:  Ennis, McGee
Wicklow:  Chapman, Pepper
Wigtownshire:  Logan, Conning
Wisconsin:  Ennis, Chapman, Logan, Ware
Maine:  Ware, Mitchell, Tarr, Davis

Offline Johnf04

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 632
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: family search website - reliable?
« Reply #2 on: Sunday 15 December 24 23:11 GMT (UK) »
The tree on Family Search is a "world tree" - a single tree that any member can edit. This explains a lot of the strangeness found there.
Farrell  - Ayrshire
Cairns - Ayrshire
McCann - Ayrshire
Brown - Ayrshire
Petty - Yorkshire, Durham
Lucas - Staffordshire, Durham
Whitaker - Yorkshire
Thackrah - Yorkshire
Stephenson - Durham
Marshall - Yorkshire
Walker - Staffordshire, Southland New Zealand
McCullough -  Antrim, Southland New Zealand,
Cavanagh - Galway, Southland New Zealand
Anthony - Tipperary, Southland New Zealand
Bath - Cornwall, Tasmania, Southland
Brungot - Alesund, Norway; Southland
Bonthron - Fifeshire, Southland

Offline Neale1961

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,387
    • View Profile
Re: family search website - reliable?
« Reply #3 on: Sunday 15 December 24 23:36 GMT (UK) »
is it a case that this website is just like ancestry where nearly everyones tree, is wrong?
Yes, more or less. Be sure you check anything before accepting it as correct.
The trees on Family Search are public trees to which anyone can contribute - add to, or change. I have seen some that are well documented, but others that are obviously just twaddle.
Milligan - Jardine – Glencross – Dinwoodie - Brown: (Dumfriesshire & Kirkcudbrightshire)
Clark – Faulds – Cuthbertson – Bryson – Wilson: (Ayrshire & Renfrewshire)
Neale – Cater – Kinder - Harrison: (Warwickshire & Queensland)
Roberts - Spry: (Cornwall, Middlesex & Queensland)
Munster: (Schleswig-Holstein & Queensland) and Plate: (Braunschweig, Neubruck & Queensland & New York)


Offline AR.Usher

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 127
    • View Profile
Re: family search website - reliable?
« Reply #4 on: Monday 16 December 24 00:47 GMT (UK) »
You can follow people on the family tree so when anyone changes anything to their information, you get notified.

I normally use it as a quick way to collect and store data for the time being until I manage to write it down, but it has helped me find relatives and trees made by others I wouldn't have found otherwise.
Essex - Usher, Pickess, Mulley, Higham, Macey, Clark, Garwood, Underton, Barker

Yorkshire - Mercer, Bratt, Zanelli, Moal/Mole, Widdison/Widdowson, Walker

Derbyshire - Widdison/Widdowson

Surrey - Usher

Staffordshire - Clueit, Edwards, Willoughby.

Wiltshire - Macey, Burt, Vincent, Coole, Lovett, Nisbeck

Suffolk - Pickess, Carpenter, Osborn

Online rosie99

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 43,939
  • ALFIE 2009 - 2021 (Rosbercon Sky's the Limit)
    • View Profile
Re: family search website - reliable?
« Reply #5 on: Monday 16 December 24 07:50 GMT (UK) »
Like any online trees the information should always be backed up by seeing the original documents, not transcripts
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Online KGarrad

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 26,713
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: family search website - reliable?
« Reply #6 on: Monday 16 December 24 07:58 GMT (UK) »
I only use FamilySearch to find records.
I have never looked at trees on there!
Garrad (Suffolk, Essex, Somerset), Crocker (Somerset), Vanstone (Devon, Jersey), Sims (Wiltshire), Bridger (Kent)

Offline MollyC

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 599
  • Preserving the past for the future
    • View Profile
Re: family search website - reliable?
« Reply #7 on: Monday 16 December 24 08:13 GMT (UK) »
It was said in a previous thread that FamilySearch is "Irritating, but useful".

Offline JenB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,293
    • View Profile
Re: family search website - reliable?
« Reply #8 on: Monday 16 December 24 09:18 GMT (UK) »
The value of FamilySearch isn't the trees, it's the huge number of records, especially for the United States.

Exactly! There are are a huge number of records to be found via a search of the catalogue. I am amazed by how few people, including Rootschatters, seem to use this.
All Census Look Ups Are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk