Author Topic: Stupid Ancestry hint  (Read 2307 times)

Offline MollyC

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 677
  • Preserving the past for the future
    • View Profile
Re: Stupid Ancestry hint
« Reply #9 on: Saturday 14 December 24 15:21 GMT (UK) »
Which is why subscribers rightly expect the person who picks up the Ancestry phone to be on top of that, not trailing along with the rest of the "anything goes" group.

Offline coombs

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,929
  • Research the dead....forget the living.
    • View Profile
Re: Stupid Ancestry hint
« Reply #10 on: Thursday 19 December 24 12:51 GMT (UK) »
And then someone else who received this hint says "yep, that nonsense checks out" and adds it, so the algorithm gives itself a pat on the back.

Yes like they have traced back to a John and Elizabeth Smith who lived in rural Somerset in the early 1800s and there is a burial flagged up on the Ancestry hints of an Elizabeth Smith in rural Norfolk in 1810, and a note says "Wife of John", and they think "Yes she must have died in Norfolk then".
Researching:

LONDON, Coombs, Roberts, Auber, Helsdon, Fradine, Morin, Goodacre
DORSET Coombs, Munday
NORFOLK Helsdon, Riches, Harbord, Budery
KENT Roberts, Goodacre
SUSSEX Walder, Boniface, Dinnage, Standen, Lee, Botten, Wickham, Jupp
SUFFOLK Titshall, Frost, Fairweather, Mayhew, Archer, Eade, Scarfe
DURHAM Stewart, Musgrave, Wilson, Forster
SCOTLAND Stewart in Selkirk
USA Musgrave, Saix
ESSEX Cornwell, Stock, Quilter, Lawrence, Whale, Clift
OXON Edgington, Smith, Inkpen, Snell, Batten, Brain

Offline Siely

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 399
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Stupid Ancestry hint
« Reply #11 on: Thursday 19 December 24 16:30 GMT (UK) »
I had several strange hints including a High Sheriff of Nottingham, Essex Lords / Knights and Mary Tudor !

(John Hacker followed his father as High Sheriff of Nottinghamshire for 1674)

No explanation was forthcoming, I closed my account.
Reformation and Counter Reformation, Agricultural and Industrial Revolutions

Offline Forfarian

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 15,940
  • http://www.rootschat.com/links/01ruz/
    • View Profile
Re: Stupid Ancestry hint
« Reply #12 on: Tuesday 24 December 24 19:51 GMT (UK) »
Ancestry isn't interested in providing accurate information. Only in exploiting other people's "research", no matter how inaccurate, for its own profit. But that so-called hint takes the biscuit.
Never trust anything you find online (especially submitted trees and transcriptions on Ancestry, MyHeritage, FindMyPast and other commercial web sites) unless it's an image of an original document - and even then be wary because errors can and do occur.


Offline andrewalston

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,965
  • My granddad
    • View Profile
Re: Stupid Ancestry hint
« Reply #13 on: Monday 30 December 24 21:52 GMT (UK) »
I provided appropriate feedback for my phone conversation, explaining that gaslighting was inappropriate, and that retraining about the real world (besides customer service) might be necessary.

A week later, I disconnected this Iris Spencer from the tree, being replaced by an Iris who had a matching 1939 Register record (found using FindMyPast), marriage and death entries.

The stupid hint remained for a further 10 days, but now the offender has hints which relate to my other Iris.

I have still to receive an email allowing me to submit technical details. In fact the only emails have been those promoting their DNA product.
Looking at ALSTON in south Ribble area, ALSTEAD and DONBAVAND/DUNBABIN etc. everywhere, HOWCROFT and MARSH in Bolton and Westhoughton, PICKERING in the Whitehaven area.

Census information is Crown Copyright. See www.nationalarchives.gov.uk for details.

Offline coombs

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,929
  • Research the dead....forget the living.
    • View Profile
Re: Stupid Ancestry hint
« Reply #14 on: Tuesday 31 December 24 13:34 GMT (UK) »
Often we can hit brickwalls in the 1800s and early 1900s, so imagine how it will be in the 1700s or before where records get more sparse. Many famous people of the time cannot be traced before they became famous, or their first marriage. Yet many will just accept Ancestry hints and think it solves the mystery, whether in the 1500s or 1900s.
Researching:

LONDON, Coombs, Roberts, Auber, Helsdon, Fradine, Morin, Goodacre
DORSET Coombs, Munday
NORFOLK Helsdon, Riches, Harbord, Budery
KENT Roberts, Goodacre
SUSSEX Walder, Boniface, Dinnage, Standen, Lee, Botten, Wickham, Jupp
SUFFOLK Titshall, Frost, Fairweather, Mayhew, Archer, Eade, Scarfe
DURHAM Stewart, Musgrave, Wilson, Forster
SCOTLAND Stewart in Selkirk
USA Musgrave, Saix
ESSEX Cornwell, Stock, Quilter, Lawrence, Whale, Clift
OXON Edgington, Smith, Inkpen, Snell, Batten, Brain