Author Topic: Griffin Mystery lady for dating please  (Read 1490 times)

Offline skippy2

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 625
  • skippy 2004/9 ... now skippy2. Copyright applies
    • View Profile
Re: Griffin Mystery lady for dating please
« Reply #9 on: Friday 04 October 24 23:04 BST (UK) »
Hi Judy,

Clean up and tone change.

Cheers,

Skippy

Offline RJ137

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,863
    • View Profile
Re: Griffin Mystery lady for dating please
« Reply #10 on: Saturday 05 October 24 05:47 BST (UK) »
My Try- a little colour to give some life

Offline oldtimer

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,616
    • View Profile
Re: Griffin Mystery lady for dating please
« Reply #11 on: Saturday 05 October 24 08:54 BST (UK) »
Hi Judy,

Clean up and tone change.

Cheers,

Skippy

Thank you Skippy - that is beautiful   :D
Best wishes, Judy :-))


"All UK Census Transcriptions are Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk"

Offline oldtimer

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,616
    • View Profile
Re: Griffin Mystery lady for dating please
« Reply #12 on: Saturday 05 October 24 08:56 BST (UK) »
My Try- a little colour to give some life

Thank you RJ! A lovely transformation  :D
Best wishes, Judy :-))


"All UK Census Transcriptions are Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk"


Offline oldtimer

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,616
    • View Profile
Re: Griffin Mystery lady for dating please
« Reply #13 on: Saturday 05 October 24 09:07 BST (UK) »
Not sure that it can be into the 1890s - sleeves especially and card stock.

e.g.

https://freepages.rootsweb.com/~victorianphotographs/history/date/a1890.htm

https://freepages.rootsweb.com/~victorianphotographs/history/date/a1892.htm

Thank you Gadget.  Looking at the examples you have given, the fashion style seemed much different by the 1890s. 
Best wishes, Judy :-))


"All UK Census Transcriptions are Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk"

Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,821
    • View Profile
Re: Griffin Mystery lady for dating please
« Reply #14 on: Saturday 05 October 24 09:14 BST (UK) »
Yes - definitely very different in the 1890s - the age of the Big Sleeve !1  They grew larger by mid-decade.

Is it possible to get your cousin to scan the back, if there's anything on it?

the site that I referenced is good for quick examples.

Add - looking at the card stock, it could be earlier than I said originally.
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***

https://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=877762.0

Offline JenB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,285
    • View Profile
Re: Griffin Mystery lady for dating please
« Reply #15 on: Saturday 05 October 24 10:51 BST (UK) »
Hi Judy and Judy  :)

I'm no expert, but my Jayne Shrimpton book says

Between 1885 and 1888/9 the bustle projection was a prominent feature and could be very pronounced jutting out sharply behind the waist, the front of the skirt usually layered and the upper fabric draped apron style over a pleated or plain under skirt.
All Census Look Ups Are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,821
    • View Profile
Re: Griffin Mystery lady for dating please
« Reply #16 on: Saturday 05 October 24 10:55 BST (UK) »
I saw that, Jennifer, but wondered about the card stock so put it more mid-decade. 

It's certainly not 1890s.
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***

https://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=877762.0

Offline jim1

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 24,816
  • ain't life grand
    • View Profile
Re: Griffin Mystery lady for dating please
« Reply #17 on: Saturday 05 October 24 12:37 BST (UK) »
I would agree no later than 1890.
I have Henry Mower at 124 Digbeth from at least 1888.
Courtesy of Brett Payne:
 directories suggest that he had another studio at 124 Digbeth, Birmingham, Warwickshire from 1886 to 1893,
As for her age I would suggest around 30.
Warks:Ashford;Cadby;Clarke;Clifford;Cooke Copage;Easthope;
Edmonds;Felton;Colledge;Lutwyche;Mander(s);May;Poole;Withers.
Staffs.Edmonds;Addison;Duffield;Webb;Fisher;Archer
Salop:Easthope,Eddowes,Hoorde,Oteley,Vernon,Talbot,De Neville.
Notts.Clarke;Redfearne;Treece.
Som.May;Perriman;Cox
India Kane;Felton;Cadby
London.Haysom.
Lancs.Gay.
Worcs.Coley;Mander;Sawyer.
Kings of Wessex & Scotland
Census information is Crown copyright,from
www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/