Author Topic: Please please help  (Read 3412 times)

Offline Heather Walsh

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 176
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Please please help
« Reply #9 on: Sunday 01 September 24 14:40 BST (UK) »
The rest of the article above is same family.....he was 48 when he died in  british columbia, been there 34 years...........  how can this be?

Offline rosie99

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 44,173
  • ALFIE 2009 - 2021 (Rosbercon Sky's the Limit)
    • View Profile
Re: Please please help
« Reply #10 on: Sunday 01 September 24 15:03 BST (UK) »
A 16 year old Robert Laurison left Londonderry for Montreal 14th July 1905.  Occupation Farmer has been dittoed against all the names on the page.
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline AlanBoyd

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,171
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Please please help
« Reply #11 on: Sunday 01 September 24 15:06 BST (UK) »
Rosie 99 has beat me to it, but here is my version with comparisons of dates.

At FindMyPast there is a record from 1905 of a Robert Laurison, age 16 [1889], farmer, sailing from Londonderry, ship Tunisian, and bound for Montreal.

The newspaper article from 1937 about the death of RL in Canada says that he was born 48 years ago [1889] and that he was resident for 34 years [1903].
Boyd, Dove, Blakey, Burdon

Offline JenB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,363
    • View Profile
Re: Please please help
« Reply #12 on: Sunday 01 September 24 15:09 BST (UK) »
What documentation have you got about the Robert Laurison who appears on the CWGC site?
I can't find anything (so far) that gives his age or parentage?
All Census Look Ups Are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Offline Heather Walsh

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 176
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Please please help
« Reply #13 on: Sunday 01 September 24 15:15 BST (UK) »
hope this works

Offline Heather Walsh

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 176
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Please please help
« Reply #14 on: Sunday 01 September 24 15:16 BST (UK) »
again

Offline AlanBoyd

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,171
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Please please help
« Reply #15 on: Sunday 01 September 24 15:20 BST (UK) »
The CWG record for Robert Laurison d 22/7/1916 has him as RIR, Rfn. 809

The medal rolls index has Robert Laurison RIR Pte. number 16/809 but the card is annotated 'see Laurison Joseph x'

It’s unclear what this ‘see Joseph’ annotation means, but there does seem to be some sort of a mix-up.
Boyd, Dove, Blakey, Burdon

Offline JenB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,363
    • View Profile
Re: Please please help
« Reply #16 on: Sunday 01 September 24 15:24 BST (UK) »
Heather, I see that the information on Findagrave has been added by you.
But what primary evidence do you have about the age and parentage of Robert on which you based your information on Findagrave?
There is no age or parentage given on the CWGC site.
All Census Look Ups Are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline AlanBoyd

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,171
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Please please help
« Reply #17 on: Sunday 01 September 24 15:30 BST (UK) »
Following on from my reply #15, I have found the medal card for Joseph Laurison. It confirms the number, 16/809 and says KIA. It is annotated "see Robert x" and in the 'Action taken' field it says

Corr. initial 'R.' (Robert.) see x @ [??]"

And I now realise that the two cards occur consecutively in the record.

My inference is that the record was intended to reflect that the card completed for Joseph Laurison was supposed to relate to Robert Laurison, but why didn’t they simply correct the Joseph Laurison card (which has more detail of medals)? As I said before, the record is confusing.
Boyd, Dove, Blakey, Burdon