Author Topic: Item in bequests stated in 1612 Will  (Read 392 times)

Offline Llanfihangel

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 609
  • Rootschat and the Library of Wales..... Superb!
    • View Profile
Item in bequests stated in 1612 Will
« on: Friday 19 July 24 01:20 BST (UK) »
Hello All!

Please see if you can make out the wording of this item in Hugh ap Gwatkin's will of 1612 Gwenddwr, Braeconshire purchased from the Library of Wales yesterday. I have marked the item in the bequest with a couple of red lines attached..

Please help once again!!

Thanks!

Llanfi

 :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :)
Pugh, Powell, Williams, Maddox, Prosser

Offline sbny357

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 220
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Item in bequests stated in 1612 Will
« Reply #1 on: Friday 19 July 24 03:45 BST (UK) »
I think it is literally the word “Item”, used as a header for each item in the will - although it looks like the ‘m’ was omitted.

Steve

Offline horselydown86

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,774
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Item in bequests stated in 1612 Will
« Reply #2 on: Friday 19 July 24 05:05 BST (UK) »
I think Llanfi means the whole text of the item.  This is what it says:

I doe sete upon John ap

hugh my soone the some of xxs at ev(er)y feast of sainct michaell tharchangell from the year

of our lord god one thowsand sixe hundred & fourteene unto thomas ap hugh for and during

the whole Terme of eight yeares next ensing if he the said thomas shall happen to live

longe



ensing = there's no contraction mark but must mean ensuing

Has the word soe/so been cut from the end of the fourth line?


Does this bequest make sense?

Offline Llanfihangel

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 609
  • Rootschat and the Library of Wales..... Superb!
    • View Profile
Re: Item in bequests stated in 1612 Will
« Reply #3 on: Friday 19 July 24 22:15 BST (UK) »
Hello horselydown86,

Yes, that makes perfect sense and it is really helpful. Watkin ap Hugh is providing alms to Gwenddwr, Llangamarch, Altmawr and Llangynog, so his relatives might be spread over a fairly wide area. Thomas ap Hugh isn't referenced as a particular relative, although others are specifically identified as "eldest son" etc.

The search goes on...

Many thanks again to you and the others in this Forum

Cheers,

Llanfi  :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :)
Pugh, Powell, Williams, Maddox, Prosser