Hi,
Thank you all for your ideas, and it sparked some new thoughts and new routes for searching.
From the entry Kay99 provided, I went to the Campbell & Dunn family, then clicked through each nearby census page. I did the full section, 41 pages.
With each new street name, I checked on the maps from MollyC and followed the enumerator's path. From Bookbox: the National Archives site lists RG 10/3789 for Constance Street. The 41 pages match that number, so I think that means Constance Street wouldn't appear elsewhere.
The addresses listed are written as follows:
Constance St. Ct. 1 No.1
do do No. 2
do do No. 3
do do No. 4
Constance St. Ct. 4 No. 1; 2; 3; 4
Constance St. Ct. 6 No. 1; 2; 3; 4
So, four house numbers within each Court.
My people are in Court 2, and the census shows Court 1, 4, 6.
Yet, the maps do not have a Court 1. Also, page 1 has the enumerator's summary, and it mentions Court 2, 4 & 6. I also had a little hunt in 1881, and couldn't find a Court 1.
So, if there's no Court 1, then maybe those households should all be Court 2.
Back to the Campbell & Dunn family, and just below them is an unusual entry.
No. 3 is marked as Uninhabited --- written in the Name section: Occupied on the 4th Inst.
1871 Census: Sunday April 2nd. It's quite possible they were the people who moved in and occupied it just days later.
Thank you again to everyone for your searching! Yes, they are the Cockburn - Larkin family, as Tickettyboo listed above. We've been missing them just in 1871, with all manner of searching variations attempted.
It was interesting to learn about the Courts and sort of tour around the neighbourhood in the maps! Liverpool isn't one of my main areas of research, so that was fun to learn more.
Thank you all!
Charlotte