« Reply #90 on: Saturday 19 October 24 17:56 BST (UK) »
DNA still depends on the accuracy of the other person's / persons' research (their ability to be able to look or find evidence, purchase or obtain the paperwork etc, Certificates, Wills) for their Tree/s.
Some Trees, are very good, but some Trees copy the errors of others, when checked against documents.
Some don't even have the Census images attached.
Keep your chins up coombs and everyone, I always maintain that some place, somewhere (unknown currently), a document, record or Headstone, has the answer, or a clue to it at least.
I'm still trying too, I've got a clearer scan of a witness signature and I'm no longer certain it says James Cockin, or B.T., Jane Cockin.
Halfway through the k, the writer has stopped and carried it on too.
Mark
A trip from Devon to Oxfordshire was maybe a couple of days on a horse and cart, and was very easy compared to a 7 month journey to Australia.
One day you may get a breakthrough with your George Hood, who was over 100 years younger than my James Gater. I reckon James came from humble beginnings and became a maltster. Very common job for those living by rivers.
Researching:
LONDON, Coombs, Roberts, Auber, Helsdon, Fradine, Morin, Goodacre
DORSET Coombs, Munday
NORFOLK Helsdon, Riches, Harbord, Budery
KENT Roberts, Goodacre
SUSSEX Walder, Boniface, Dinnage, Standen, Lee, Botten, Wickham, Jupp
SUFFOLK Titshall, Frost, Fairweather, Mayhew, Archer, Eade, Scarfe
DURHAM Stewart, Musgrave, Wilson, Forster
SCOTLAND Stewart in Selkirk
USA Musgrave, Saix
ESSEX Cornwell, Stock, Quilter, Lawrence, Whale, Clift
OXON Edgington, Smith, Inkpen, Snell, Batten, Brain