Author Topic: Birth registration rules in 1901 UK  (Read 3046 times)

Offline coombs

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,921
  • Research the dead....forget the living.
    • View Profile
Re: Birth registration rules in 1901 UK
« Reply #45 on: Tuesday 14 May 24 14:55 BST (UK) »
Keeping many, very detailed records for their very nosey and determined descendants generations later was not on their list of priorities.  ;D
Researching:

LONDON, Coombs, Roberts, Auber, Helsdon, Fradine, Morin, Goodacre
DORSET Coombs, Munday
NORFOLK Helsdon, Riches, Harbord, Budery
KENT Roberts, Goodacre
SUSSEX Walder, Boniface, Dinnage, Standen, Lee, Botten, Wickham, Jupp
SUFFOLK Titshall, Frost, Fairweather, Mayhew, Archer, Eade, Scarfe
DURHAM Stewart, Musgrave, Wilson, Forster
SCOTLAND Stewart in Selkirk
USA Musgrave, Saix
ESSEX Cornwell, Stock, Quilter, Lawrence, Whale, Clift
OXON Edgington, Smith, Inkpen, Snell, Batten, Brain

Offline iolaus

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,157
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Birth registration rules in 1901 UK
« Reply #46 on: Tuesday 14 May 24 21:44 BST (UK) »
My great grandfather was born 1900 - he was registered as being born on the 22nd January (he was registered 42 days after that) he was actually born on the 18th

I know he was born on the 18th -a) his baptism record shows the 18th (lie to the government but don't lie to god) and b) he told me - apparently he discovered this in his 20s when he first saw his birth certificate and his mother confessed - always celebrated his birthday on the 18th - but wrote the 22nd on forms so his mum wouldn't get into trouble

Offline iolaus

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,157
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Birth registration rules in 1901 UK
« Reply #47 on: Tuesday 14 May 24 21:51 BST (UK) »
Thank you, everyone, for all the information - it’s so useful.

How common was it for a child’s birth to go completely unregistered in the mid 1870s?  Was that even possible?  I haven’t been able to find my ancestor even though I’ve tried everything I can think of - different spellings, sounds like, searching different years, different areas, etc.

She obviously doesn’t want to be found!

It may also be worth trying as a male

My great great grandmother was baptised as a girl Emily at 2-3 weeks old, week later her parents registered a birth born the same day as Emily but a boy Henry - no record of Henry's baptism or death

The conclusion I reached was trying to say 'Enry' and 'Emly' in a broad west country accent and the registrar mishearing

That said a photo of Emily does look scarily like my brother in drag