Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: army punishment  (Read 870 times)

Offline DORAN54

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,243
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
army punishment
« on: Saturday 15 July 23 16:36 BST (UK) »
Hi  could someone explain this punishment to me please

Offline Andy J2022

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,117
    • View Profile
Re: army punishment
« Reply #1 on: Saturday 15 July 23 22:52 BST (UK) »
I can't help with an explanation of  this particular 'punishment' other than provide two pieces of background information.

King's Regulations (in this case this version published in 1912) are very specific about which minor punishments may be awarded (see paras 493 -507) and bounty boards are not mentioned. As stated in para 500 an officer is not permitted to introduce any other punishment not contained in the Regulations.

The only use of the term bounty at that time was the financial award made to soldiers who extended their service beyond their committed date. If the soldier subsequently changed his mind about extending his service he would be required to repay the bounty, or a proportion of it based on the additional time he had in fact served. If a bounty needed to be repaid then the calculation was done by the regimental pay office (for example, see KRs para 395). I can find no references to bounty boards in general.

Offline DORAN54

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,243
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: army punishment
« Reply #2 on: Saturday 15 July 23 23:59 BST (UK) »
ok thank you  very much for your reply

Online ShaunJ

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,185
    • View Profile
Re: army punishment
« Reply #3 on: Sunday 16 July 23 23:14 BST (UK) »
Which country's army is this? Can you post a link to the record ?
UK Census info. Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline DORAN54

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,243
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: army punishment
« Reply #4 on: Sunday 16 July 23 23:18 BST (UK) »
Irish national army .  army 1922 census

Online ShaunJ

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,185
    • View Profile
Re: army punishment
« Reply #5 on: Monday 17 July 23 08:24 BST (UK) »
There was no Irish army at the time of the offence in 1913 so presumably he was in a British regiment at that time - have you been able to find a British army record for him?
UK Census info. Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline DORAN54

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,243
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: army punishment
« Reply #6 on: Monday 17 July 23 11:40 BST (UK) »
i haven't  found other army records he is named as padraig in the 1922 army census but it is patrick
in other records

Online ShaunJ

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,185
    • View Profile
Re: army punishment
« Reply #7 on: Monday 17 July 23 11:57 BST (UK) »
I think he was probably 18402 in the Royal Irish Fusiliers. If so only the WW1 medal records have survived.

In 1913 the RIF had a Colour Sergeant Fluke (whose name appears on the "offence" record you posted).

The offence record is not a census record so I'm wondering where you found that?
UK Census info. Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline DORAN54

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,243
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: army punishment
« Reply #8 on: Monday 17 July 23 12:09 BST (UK) »
no i realised it wasn't the census after i posted reply . as i only took a snippet of the original post i'm having trouble finding it again  i thought i had added it to my tree as well  it's got to be there somewhere ::)
Pages: [1] 2