Ralph Marple

[loord74]

The OP does seem to post images that are really too small to do very much with using pre-AI software, especially when they're blurred

I think the size of the images might suggest that they are  from online trees as they are so small. I've found a version online,  sized  642x767,  and is far less blurred than this one. The earliest version seems to have been uploaded in 2010.

Gadget

Can you post the 642x767 img size here?? Just for comparison

[RJ137]

My try-one original tint, one B&W and one colour

[Keybob]

Something different

[hoobaloo]

A try from me, regards, John.

[Gadget]

I think the size of the images might suggest that they are  from online trees as they are so small. I've found a version online,  sized  642x767,  and is far less blurred than this one. The earliest version seems to have been uploaded in 2010.

Can you post the 642x767 img size here?? Just for comparison

I wouldn't want to risk breaking any copyright rules. Add - or post without permission of the original owner.

[roland marple]

Thank you to all who replied, it was a difficult photo to work with . I wish all of you the very best and keep up the great works
roland

[roland marple]

Thank you to all ,who replied. It was a very difficult photo to work with but any thing was better than what I had. so thanks again and keep up the great work.
roland