Author Topic: CWGC postcode search inaccuracies  (Read 1499 times)

Offline Davedrave

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,783
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
CWGC postcode search inaccuracies
« on: Sunday 25 June 23 16:07 BST (UK) »
I have only just come across the postcode search feature on the CWGC website. I was initially impressed, but very soon I’ve realised that it probably contains a great many inaccuracies. For example, putting a postcode in I found a 1918 record where the soldier lived in Brook Street in my town (cleared away in the 1950’s) but the postcode search shows a property in Brook Road (several miles away and 1960’s or later).

At least that record shows the correct town. However, a civilian death in 1941, in Lewisham, London, shows a modern development in a street of the same name in a Midlands suburb! The road still exists in Lewisham, and most of the houses pre-date 1941, though a block has been rebuilt (the bomb-damaged ones?). The Midlands location is 100 miles away and dates from well after the war.

Another postcode search shows the wrong village suburb for another record. And these errors are out of only about ten records viewed so far.

I suspect that these errors are probably the tip of a very large iceberg.

Offline JenB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,362
    • View Profile
Re: CWGC postcode search inaccuracies
« Reply #1 on: Sunday 25 June 23 16:54 BST (UK) »
I've just tried a search using my postcode.

It gives me a result a few streets away in an Alexandra Crescent (Hexham).

The only problem is that the correct Alexandra Crescent was in Blyth, some 30 miles away.
All Census Look Ups Are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Deirdre784

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,178
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: CWGC postcode search inaccuracies
« Reply #2 on: Sunday 25 June 23 17:12 BST (UK) »
I have just tried this having not seen the postcode option before. It produced one result, a few streets away from me, and the entry was spot on :)
CARDIFF:Lord,Griffiths,Barry,Cope,Mahoney ~ PEMBROKESHIRE:Griffiths,Rees,Owen,Thomas ~ ESSEX:Lord,Foreman,Hatch ~ SOMERSET:Lord,Cox,Hockey,Linham,Bryant ~ STAFFORDSHIRE:Cope,Elks,Hackney,Gallimore,Davenport ~ SUFFOLK:Lord,Lockwood,Hatch,Rix,Foreman ~ IRELAND:Barry,Meany,Cummins,Grogan ~
PONTYPRIDD:Leigh,Brooks,Adams,Davies,Thomas ~ KENT:Leigh ~ CHESHIRE:Adams,Tudor,Illidge ~ DENBIGHSHIRE:Edwards,Bolas ~BRECON:Leigh,Thomas,Davies ~SOMERSET:Adams,Keitch,Bridge ~ABERGAVENNY:Minton ~ MERTHYR:.....

Online Top-of-the-hill

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,972
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: CWGC postcode search inaccuracies
« Reply #3 on: Sunday 25 June 23 17:56 BST (UK) »
  I have just had a play with it and it seems utterly pointless to me. As has been said, the postcodes bring up fairly random places, or nothing at all. As most of the houses the soldiers lived in have long gone and postcodes were only invented in the 1970s(?), how is it supposed to work?
Pay, Kent
Codham/Coltham, Kent
Kent, Felton, Essex
Staples, Wiltshire


Online rosie99

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 44,136
  • ALFIE 2009 - 2021 (Rosbercon Sky's the Limit)
    • View Profile
Re: CWGC postcode search inaccuracies
« Reply #4 on: Sunday 25 June 23 17:59 BST (UK) »
My postcode produced one result which was spot on.  The map that was attached showed 2 other records, the only thing wrong was they were linked to each others house in different roads but just a few hundred yards apart.
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Online heywood

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 42,407
    • View Profile
Re: CWGC postcode search inaccuracies
« Reply #5 on: Sunday 25 June 23 18:01 BST (UK) »
Same for me too, Deirdre. - Just a short walk down the lane.
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,742
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: CWGC postcode search inaccuracies
« Reply #6 on: Sunday 25 June 23 18:05 BST (UK) »
Deleted
Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY

Online heywood

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 42,407
    • View Profile
Re: CWGC postcode search inaccuracies
« Reply #7 on: Sunday 25 June 23 18:08 BST (UK) »
It is showing those who died from your present area.
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Online Top-of-the-hill

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,972
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: CWGC postcode search inaccuracies
« Reply #8 on: Sunday 25 June 23 18:16 BST (UK) »
  Except that it doesn't!
Pay, Kent
Codham/Coltham, Kent
Kent, Felton, Essex
Staples, Wiltshire