Author Topic: Has Anyone Every Come Across This Symbol on the 1891 Census?  (Read 893 times)

Offline Suziewoozy22

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 18
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Has Anyone Every Come Across This Symbol on the 1891 Census?
« on: Thursday 01 June 23 16:23 BST (UK) »
Hi,

Has anyone ever seen this square with four dots symbol on a census return before? This is for Turk's Row in Chelsea, and is a common lodging house. The way the inhabitants are listed is strange too, but not sure if that has anything to do with it.

Many thanks
Whitehouse, Wall, Pedley, Rowley, Kelsall

Offline AlgarvePete

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 328
  • Grandad Harry and 3 of my uncles.
    • View Profile
Re: Has Anyone Every Come Across This Symbol on the 1891 Census?
« Reply #1 on: Thursday 01 June 23 16:27 BST (UK) »
I think it's to point out that head and wife are entered in wrong order.
Mainly researching the Lees from Herts but also compiling a one name study of Culverhouse

Online Andy J2022

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,168
    • View Profile
Re: Has Anyone Every Come Across This Symbol on the 1891 Census?
« Reply #2 on: Thursday 01 June 23 17:05 BST (UK) »
It's an asterisk * so the previous explanation by AlgarvePete makes complete sense.

Offline Suziewoozy22

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 18
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Has Anyone Every Come Across This Symbol on the 1891 Census?
« Reply #3 on: Thursday 01 June 23 18:01 BST (UK) »
Thanks guys, I didn't read it as an asterix, but a square and 4 dots which I know is symbol for certain things (vinegar!) but if it is an asterix it makes perfect sense as you say.
Whitehouse, Wall, Pedley, Rowley, Kelsall


Offline KGarrad

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 26,914
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Has Anyone Every Come Across This Symbol on the 1891 Census?
« Reply #4 on: Thursday 01 June 23 20:18 BST (UK) »
It's not an asterix, it's a Reference Mark (※, Unicode 203B), generally used preceding an additional comment or supplemental information.
Garrad (Suffolk, Essex, Somerset), Crocker (Somerset), Vanstone (Devon, Jersey), Sims (Wiltshire), Bridger (Kent)

Online Andy J2022

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,168
    • View Profile
Re: Has Anyone Every Come Across This Symbol on the 1891 Census?
« Reply #5 on: Thursday 01 June 23 20:48 BST (UK) »
Thanks, KG. Here's Wikipedia's take on the subject:
"The [reference mark] symbol was used historically to call attention to an important sentence or idea, such as a prologue or footnote. As an indicator of a note, the mark serves the exact same purpose as the asterisk in English."

Offline tellx

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 119
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Has Anyone Every Come Across This Symbol on the 1891 Census?
« Reply #6 on: Friday 02 June 23 04:50 BST (UK) »
Do the marks signify the second house within schedule number 158 ?
Terry, Greenway, Hudson, Conway, Simmonds, Childs, Oram, Dee, Bennett, Smith, Sturge, Bolas, Gibbons

Offline KGarrad

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 26,914
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Has Anyone Every Come Across This Symbol on the 1891 Census?
« Reply #7 on: Friday 02 June 23 06:17 BST (UK) »
Do the marks signify the second house within schedule number 158 ?

That's indicated by a single slash (/) between households, and a double slash (//) between dwellings.
Garrad (Suffolk, Essex, Somerset), Crocker (Somerset), Vanstone (Devon, Jersey), Sims (Wiltshire), Bridger (Kent)

Offline tellx

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 119
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Has Anyone Every Come Across This Symbol on the 1891 Census?
« Reply #8 on: Friday 02 June 23 15:09 BST (UK) »
Do the marks signify the second house within schedule number 158 ?

That's indicated by a single slash (/) between households, and a double slash (//) between dwellings.

I can't see any separation between the two houses on that schedule number. In most (maybe all) of the 1881 census pages I have, anywhere there is a single slash to denote a new household there is a new schedule number.
Terry, Greenway, Hudson, Conway, Simmonds, Childs, Oram, Dee, Bennett, Smith, Sturge, Bolas, Gibbons