Author Topic: Ancestry SideView Technology to be Extended  (Read 10057 times)

Offline Gow67

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 148
  • GGF Jock Gow
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry SideView Technology to be Extended
« Reply #9 on: Wednesday 05 October 22 22:46 BST (UK) »
Thanks a lot.

I see it on the website but not on my app.

Website saying: "Something went wrong. Please try again later."

Now I know where it is though will keep an eye on it.

Thanks again!

G67
Gow Burt Rooney McMeeking Stanners Burness Anderson Crookston West Rankine Dickson Bernard

Offline LizzieL

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 9,031
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry SideView Technology to be Extended
« Reply #10 on: Thursday 06 October 22 07:13 BST (UK) »
Thanks a lot.

I see it on the website but not on my app.

Website saying: "Something went wrong. Please try again later."



I keep getting the same thing
Berks / Oxon: Eltham, Annetts, Wiltshire (surname not county), Hawkins, Pembroke, Partridge
Dorset / Hants: Derham, Stride, Purkiss, Sibley
Yorkshire: Pottage, Carr, Blackburn, Depledge
Sussex: Goodyer, Christopher, Trevatt
Lanark: Scott (soldier went to Jersey CI)
Jersey: Fowler, Huelin, Scott

Offline Pheno

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,080
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry SideView Technology to be Extended
« Reply #11 on: Thursday 06 October 22 08:09 BST (UK) »
I am reliably told that Ancestry started rolling this out yesterday but have said it will take until midnight tonight (Thursday) before everyone has the feature so a wait and see game.

Pheno
Austin/Austen - Sussex & London
Bond - Berkshire & London
Bishop - Sussex & Kent
Holland - Essex
Nevitt - Cheshire & Staffordshire
Wray - Yorkshire

Offline LizzieL

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 9,031
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry SideView Technology to be Extended
« Reply #12 on: Thursday 06 October 22 08:19 BST (UK) »
Just looked again, I now have labels saying parent 1's side, parent 2's side and unassigned. Where I had already put in maternal or paternal side, no new label has been added, so I don't have confirmation. One at least of my matches where Ancestry has identified a common ancestor which I have verified, has been labelled unassigned, even though I have four shared matches with that person , three of which are now labelled Parent 1's side (my father) and the other I had already labelled paternal side. This one now has a little note "This match is on your Parent 1's side. Do you want to change Parent 1 to Paternal side? This will label all Parent 1 matches Paternal side and Parent 2 matches Maternal side".
Berks / Oxon: Eltham, Annetts, Wiltshire (surname not county), Hawkins, Pembroke, Partridge
Dorset / Hants: Derham, Stride, Purkiss, Sibley
Yorkshire: Pottage, Carr, Blackburn, Depledge
Sussex: Goodyer, Christopher, Trevatt
Lanark: Scott (soldier went to Jersey CI)
Jersey: Fowler, Huelin, Scott


Offline LizzieL

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 9,031
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry SideView Technology to be Extended
« Reply #13 on: Thursday 06 October 22 08:32 BST (UK) »
I have one match who is related on both sides. (Was very surprised when I found it because father from Berks / Oxon and mother from Dorset / Hants coast, but my match's ancestors met up about half way between!). ancestry has labelled this a paternal as we are 3rd cousins through my paternal ancestor and 5th cousins once removed through my maternal ancestor.
Berks / Oxon: Eltham, Annetts, Wiltshire (surname not county), Hawkins, Pembroke, Partridge
Dorset / Hants: Derham, Stride, Purkiss, Sibley
Yorkshire: Pottage, Carr, Blackburn, Depledge
Sussex: Goodyer, Christopher, Trevatt
Lanark: Scott (soldier went to Jersey CI)
Jersey: Fowler, Huelin, Scott

Offline Pheno

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,080
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry SideView Technology to be Extended
« Reply #14 on: Thursday 06 October 22 10:14 BST (UK) »
How would you know if you had previously got the assignment between maternal and paternal wrong?

I had previously assigned to either maternal or paternal side and now those same groups of people are saying the same thing and appearing correctly under either maternal or paternal matches.  Would there be some indication that I had said maternal for instance and that the match was appearing in the paternal listing?  Or did I simply get it right every time?

Pheno
Austin/Austen - Sussex & London
Bond - Berkshire & London
Bishop - Sussex & Kent
Holland - Essex
Nevitt - Cheshire & Staffordshire
Wray - Yorkshire

Offline ikas

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 329
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry SideView Technology to be Extended
« Reply #15 on: Thursday 06 October 22 10:21 BST (UK) »
Thanks a lot.

Iebsite saying: "Something went wrong. Please try again later."

Now I know where it is though will keep an eye on it.

Thanks again!

G67

I was getting that error message as well. I have just realised it was because I was hitting the new parent button. If you just look at the list of matches you will see they have been allocated to parent 1, parent 2, or unassigned.

I assume pressing the parent button will at some point allow you to select all parent1 matches or parent 2 matches or even unassigned matches. Is this feature already working for anyone?

At first pass it seems accurate but some surprising unassigned.

Offline Pheno

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,080
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry SideView Technology to be Extended
« Reply #16 on: Thursday 06 October 22 10:39 BST (UK) »

I was getting that error message as well. I have just realised it was because I was hitting the new parent button. If you just look at the list of matches you will see they have been allocated to parent 1, parent 2, or unassigned.

I assume pressing the parent button will at some point allow you to select all parent1 matches or parent 2 matches or even unassigned matches. Is this feature already working for anyone?

At first pass it seems accurate but some surprising unassigned.
[/quote]

Yes thats exactly what it is like.  The matches, having used the 'By Parent' heading are then in 3 groups Maternal Matches, Paternal Matches & Unassigned matches.  You then proceed by choosing one of these options.

I have allocated maternal & paternal to Parent 1 & Parent 2.  If you haven't it might be that the headings are Parent 1 matches & Parent 2 matches.

Pheno

Austin/Austen - Sussex & London
Bond - Berkshire & London
Bishop - Sussex & Kent
Holland - Essex
Nevitt - Cheshire & Staffordshire
Wray - Yorkshire

Offline ikas

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 329
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry SideView Technology to be Extended
« Reply #17 on: Thursday 06 October 22 11:27 BST (UK) »
Good to hear that parent button is working for you, Pheno. Guess I will just have to be patient. So far I have not found any incorrect allocations but the unassigned is occasionally bizarre. One of my matches is unassigned but her daughter is correctly assigned. Even more inexplicable is another match where ancestry has correctly identified the common ancestor but still labels the match unassigned.  ???