« Reply #28 on: Tuesday 20 September 22 12:59 BST (UK) »
We always will find .... a shotgun wedding, but the huge amount of pregnant brides in the 1700s and 1800s, and earlier and later, shows bridal pregnancy was actually very, very common.
Well, these days pregnancy is also pretty common (though perhaps less common than back then
) but the bridal part is often postponed until years later. We've all got used to it.
But as far as the 1800s are concerned, I think that when a young couple got engaged or plighted their troth, intimacy began, perhaps to find out whether the union would be fertile. If that was proved, a wedding was promptly arranged, with the result you describe. There are a few examples in my tree.
Yes, and mine.
I have a case of my 3xreat gran whose recorded mother was 51 at the time of the birth, but had the middle name of an older sister who went on to have several more illegitimate children. I think the "older sister" was her birth mother, as the recorded 51 year old mother's previous child was born 8 years earlier. Goes to show that you do not always know who the mother is, you can get NME's as well as NPE's. Grandmother passed off as mother for instance.
Researching:
LONDON, Coombs, Roberts, Auber, Helsdon, Fradine, Morin, Goodacre
DORSET Coombs, Munday
NORFOLK Helsdon, Riches, Harbord, Budery
KENT Roberts, Goodacre
SUSSEX Walder, Boniface, Dinnage, Standen, Lee, Botten, Wickham, Jupp
SUFFOLK Titshall, Frost, Fairweather, Mayhew, Archer, Eade, Scarfe
DURHAM Stewart, Musgrave, Wilson, Forster
SCOTLAND Stewart in Selkirk
USA Musgrave, Saix
ESSEX Cornwell, Stock, Quilter, Lawrence, Whale, Clift
OXON Edgington, Smith, Inkpen, Snell, Batten, Brain