« Reply #19 on: Monday 18 July 22 00:01 BST (UK) »
"So basically my friend is very distantly related to me, via not a bloodline relative? A simple yes/no answer"
You're clearly desperate to tell your friend you're 'related', which you aren't i.e. ignoring the facts shown via the definition you gave us & the very obvious to follow example I posted.
I'll try one last time...
Anyone marrying into your family is only related to you via that marriage i.e. you are not related to anyone else who is related to the person who married into your family in any way/shape/form either by blood or not i.e. the simple answer is no!
Please read over the example I gave regarding my maternal aunt & her husband.
As I mentioned previously, you could say your friend & you 'connect/link' to the said g g/aunt & her husband but in no way do you directly connect/link to each other i.e. not 'related' in any way as the friend is connected to one half of the marriage & you to the other.
Any relationship to a 'marry-in' to your family goes no further than that 1 person.
Annie
South Uist, Inverness-shire, Scotland:- Bowie, Campbell, Cumming, Currie
Ireland:- Cullen, Flannigan (Derry), Donahoe/Donaghue (variants) (Cork), McCrate (Tipperary), Mellon, Tol(l)and (Donegal & Tyrone)
Newcastle-on-Tyne/Durham (Northumberland):- Harrison, Jude, Kemp, Lunn, Mellon, Robson, Stirling
Kettering, Northampton:- MacKinnon
Canada:- Callaghan, Cumming, MacPhee
"OLD GENEALOGISTS NEVER DIE - THEY JUST LOSE THEIR CENSUS"