Author Topic: John Murray  (Read 4842 times)

Offline Forfarian

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 15,936
  • http://www.rootschat.com/links/01ruz/
    • View Profile
Re: John Murray
« Reply #54 on: Wednesday 25 May 22 18:38 BST (UK) »
The more I read this thread and all the other threads about Robert Campbell Murray the more muddled and confused I get.

You seem to be picking John Murrays at random and trying to make them fit.

I believe that you wish to ascertain the identity of the father of Robert Murray Campbell, illegitimate son of Annie Melville Campbell, who was born on 21 December 1921 in Stirling?

Robert had an illegitimate (half-?)brother, John Murray, born 17 July 1925 in Stirling to Annie Melville Campbell. On this occasion John Murray signed as the child's father. The father of an illegitimate child can only be named on the birth certificate if the father accompanies the mother to the registrar's when she goes to register the birth, and signs the register at the same time as she does. The birth is then indexed under both surnames. Therefore there is no doubt that John Murray acknowledged himself to be the father of John born 1925.

In 1931 Annie Melville Campbell marries John William Buchanan Wilson. He dies in Larbert in 1949, aged 53.

Quote
The Certified Copy of their Entry of Marriage on 12 August 1944;  Registration District FYLDE in the County of Lancaster.   Column 2:  John Murray Seaman (Merchant Service) , Annie Melville Campbell Housekeeper.  Column 7 (Father's Name and Surname) was blank.  Column 8  (Rank or Profession of Father) was also blank.  Signed by Registrar of Marriages Robert J. Waring.
This makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. On the face of it, this is the marriage of the parents of Robert Campbell Murray and John Murray, but that can't be the case because as far as we know Annie Melville Campbell was by then Mrs John William Buchan Wilson.

According to FreeBMD there is no record of the marriage of either a John Murray, or an Annie Melville Campbell in Fylde in 1944. However Robert M Campbell married Catherine I Lonsdale in Fylde in 1944.

So the above transcription of the marriage certificate is incorrect and therefore irrelevant.

If Robert did not name John Murray as his father when he got married, in spite of the fact that John Murray was the father of Robert's (half-?) brother John, born 1925, this must call into question why not. Did Robert really not know the name of John born 1925's father, when John born 1925 did know who his father was? Or did he know that he was not the full brother of John born 1925? In which case his father was not John Murray at all, which would be why he didn't name him on his marriage certificate.

Quote
I have one person to verify before I go look up the Marine Return.  This person was about the age of John Murray.  I am in the process of gathering information on this new person.  So I should have more details to share later today. This John Murray was known to Mr. John William Buchan Wilson the wife of Annie Murray Campbell.
Can you clarify this please? How do you know that 'this person', whoever he was, was known to John William Buchan Wilson?

(I assume you mean 'the husband of Annie Melville Campbell' rather that 'the wife of Annie Murray Campbell')

Quote
John Murray was born 7 July 1898 in Saint Ninians, Stirlingshire, Scotland and died in Waitakere, Auckland, New Zealand according to a relative .... To our knowledge John Murray was an engineer.  He was a seaman in the UK merchant service and he may have died at sea.
He can't have died at Waitakere and at sea.

Why does the relative think he is the John Murray who died at Waitakere, and where does the information come from that says he was a seaman and may have died at sea?

According to the official New Zealand deaths index none of the seven John Murrays who died in New Zealand in 1980 was born in 1898, let alone on 7 July 1898; and none has the middle name Campbell. There is one death of a John Campbell Murray in New Zealand, born 3 January 1914, died 1972. So it looks as if (yet again) Ancestry is providing disinformation.
Never trust anything you find online (especially submitted trees and transcriptions on Ancestry, MyHeritage, FindMyPast and other commercial web sites) unless it's an image of an original document - and even then be wary because errors can and do occur.

Offline muriellecampbell

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 76
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: John Murray
« Reply #55 on: Wednesday 25 May 22 19:54 BST (UK) »
The more I read this thread and all the other threads about Robert Campbell Murray the more muddled and confused I get.

You seem to be picking John Murrays at random and trying to make them fit.

I believe that you wish to ascertain the identity of the father of Robert Murray Campbell, illegitimate son of Annie Melville Campbell, who was born on 21 December 1921 in Stirling?

Robert had an illegitimate (half-?)brother, John Murray, born 17 July 1925 in Stirling to Annie Melville Campbell. On this occasion John Murray signed as the child's father. The father of an illegitimate child can only be named on the birth certificate if the father accompanies the mother to the registrar's when she goes to register the birth, and signs the register at the same time as she does. The birth is then indexed under both surnames. Therefore there is no doubt that John Murray acknowledged himself to be the father of John born 1925.

In 1931 Annie Melville Campbell marries John William Buchanan Wilson. He dies in Larbert in 1949, aged 53.

Quote
The Certified Copy of their Entry of Marriage on 12 August 1944;  Registration District FYLDE in the County of Lancaster.   Column 2:  John Murray Seaman (Merchant Service) , Annie Melville Campbell Housekeeper.  Column 7 (Father's Name and Surname) was blank.  Column 8  (Rank or Profession of Father) was also blank.  Signed by Registrar of Marriages Robert J. Waring.
This makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. On the face of it, this is the marriage of the parents of Robert Campbell Murray and John Murray, but that can't be the case because as far as we know Annie Melville Campbell was by then Mrs John William Buchan Wilson.

According to FreeBMD there is no record of the marriage of either a John Murray, or an Annie Melville Campbell in Fylde in 1944. However Robert M Campbell married Catherine I Lonsdale in Fylde in 1944.
So the above transcription of the marriage certificate is incorrect and therefore irrelevant.

If Robert did not name John Murray as his father when he got married, in spite of the fact that John Murray was the father of Robert's (half-?) brother John, born 1925, this must call into question why not. Did Robert really not know the name of John born 1925's father, when John born 1925 did know who his father was? Or did he know that he was not the full brother of John born 1925? In which case his father was not John Murray at all, which would be why he didn't name him on his marriage certificate.

The correct information is Robert Murray Campbell and Catherine (Irene) Lonsdale married on Aug 12, 1944.  They were my father-in-law and mother-in-law so I know this to be correct.  Annie Melville Campbell did have the two sons with John Murray Snr. (Robert Murray Campbell b) Dec 24, 1921 and John Murray Jnr. (b. July 17, 1925) both were born at 66 Cowane Street, Stirling, Scotland.  The two boys knew each other when they were young.  They were in an orphanage we believe to be Whinmwell home for children, Bridge Street, Stirling, Scotland.

Quote
I have one person to verify before I go look up the Marine Return.  This person was about the age of John Murray.  I am in the process of gathering information on this new person.  So I should have more details to share later today. This John Murray was known to Mr. John William Buchan Wilson the wife of Annie Murray Campbell.
Can you clarify this please? How do you know that 'this person', whoever he was, was known to John William Buchan Wilson?  No, we don't know who if John William Buchan Wilson knew John Murray Snr. but he certainly knew John Murray Jr. and Robert Murray Campbell since the boys stayed at the home of Annie Melville Campbell, their mother and John William Buchan Wilson after they married Oct 31, 1931.

(I assume you mean 'the husband of Annie Melville Campbell' rather that 'the wife of Annie Murray Campbell')

Quote
John Murray was born 7 July 1898 in Saint Ninians, Stirlingshire, Scotland and died in Waitakere, Auckland, New Zealand according to a relative .... To our knowledge John Murray was an engineer.  He was a seaman in the UK merchant service and he may have died at sea.
He can't have died at Waitakere and at sea.

Why does the relative think he is the John Murray who died at Waitakere, and where does the information come from that says he was a seaman and may have died at sea?

According to the official New Zealand deaths index none of the seven John Murrays who died in New Zealand in 1980 was born in 1898, let alone on 7 July 1898; and none has the middle name Campbell. There is one death of a John Campbell Murray in New Zealand, born 3 January 1914, died 1972. So it looks as if (yet again) Ancestry is providing disinformation.
Sorry we have to disregard this John Murray who died in 1980.  Should we delete the post that no longer fit who we are looking for? 

Murray and Campbell

Offline Rosinish

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,241
  • PASSED & PAST
    • View Profile
Re: John Murray
« Reply #56 on: Wednesday 25 May 22 20:14 BST (UK) »
The more I read this thread and all the other threads about Robert Campbell Murray the more muddled and confused I get.

You seem to be picking John Murrays at random and trying to make them fit.

I agree on that but the problem is, the OP has the same access to any records as we have i.e. why not look at the records to prove/disprove any theories  ???

Annie
South Uist, Inverness-shire, Scotland:- Bowie, Campbell, Cumming, Currie

Ireland:- Cullen, Flannigan (Derry), Donahoe/Donaghue (variants) (Cork), McCrate (Tipperary), Mellon, Tol(l)and (Donegal & Tyrone)

Newcastle-on-Tyne/Durham (Northumberland):- Harrison, Jude, Kemp, Lunn, Mellon, Robson, Stirling

Kettering, Northampton:- MacKinnon

Canada:- Callaghan, Cumming, MacPhee

"OLD GENEALOGISTS NEVER DIE - THEY JUST LOSE THEIR CENSUS"

Offline Rosinish

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,241
  • PASSED & PAST
    • View Profile
Re: John Murray
« Reply #57 on: Wednesday 25 May 22 20:22 BST (UK) »
If Robert did not name John Murray as his father when he got married, in spite of the fact that John Murray was the father of Robert's (half-?) brother John, born 1925, this must call into question why not. Did Robert really not know the name of John born 1925's father, when John born 1925 did know who his father was? Or did he know that he was not the full brother of John born 1925? In which case his father was not John Murray at all, which would be why he didn't name him on his marriage certificate.

Definitely odd, if he knew who his father was, why not name him on his marriage  ???

Does John Jnr. have descendants who you know of, who may be willing or already have taken a DNA test?

This seems the only way to know whether they shared the same father.

Annie
South Uist, Inverness-shire, Scotland:- Bowie, Campbell, Cumming, Currie

Ireland:- Cullen, Flannigan (Derry), Donahoe/Donaghue (variants) (Cork), McCrate (Tipperary), Mellon, Tol(l)and (Donegal & Tyrone)

Newcastle-on-Tyne/Durham (Northumberland):- Harrison, Jude, Kemp, Lunn, Mellon, Robson, Stirling

Kettering, Northampton:- MacKinnon

Canada:- Callaghan, Cumming, MacPhee

"OLD GENEALOGISTS NEVER DIE - THEY JUST LOSE THEIR CENSUS"


Offline muriellecampbell

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 76
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: John Murray
« Reply #58 on: Wednesday 25 May 22 20:30 BST (UK) »
The more I read this thread and all the other threads about Robert Campbell Murray the more muddled and confused I get.

You seem to be picking John Murrays at random and trying to make them fit.

I agree on that but the problem is, the OP has the same access to any records as we have i.e. why not look at the records to prove/disprove any theories  ???

Annie
  What do you mean "OP"?  I live in Canada and I am not familiar.
Murray and Campbell

Offline Rosinish

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,241
  • PASSED & PAST
    • View Profile
Re: John Murray
« Reply #59 on: Wednesday 25 May 22 20:41 BST (UK) »
What do you mean "OP"? 

'OP' means Original Poster i.e. the person who started the thread.

Annie
South Uist, Inverness-shire, Scotland:- Bowie, Campbell, Cumming, Currie

Ireland:- Cullen, Flannigan (Derry), Donahoe/Donaghue (variants) (Cork), McCrate (Tipperary), Mellon, Tol(l)and (Donegal & Tyrone)

Newcastle-on-Tyne/Durham (Northumberland):- Harrison, Jude, Kemp, Lunn, Mellon, Robson, Stirling

Kettering, Northampton:- MacKinnon

Canada:- Callaghan, Cumming, MacPhee

"OLD GENEALOGISTS NEVER DIE - THEY JUST LOSE THEIR CENSUS"

Offline Forfarian

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 15,936
  • http://www.rootschat.com/links/01ruz/
    • View Profile
Re: John Murray
« Reply #60 on: Wednesday 25 May 22 20:47 BST (UK) »
why not look at the records to prove/disprove any theories  ???
Well ... If my theory is correct, that is that John Murray was not the father of Robert Campbell Murray, the records won't either prove or disprove it :)

You're quite right that only DNA can ever solve this one - and if JM was not the father of RCM, it could only prove that we are looking for the wrong person, not tell us who the right person was.
Never trust anything you find online (especially submitted trees and transcriptions on Ancestry, MyHeritage, FindMyPast and other commercial web sites) unless it's an image of an original document - and even then be wary because errors can and do occur.

Offline Forfarian

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 15,936
  • http://www.rootschat.com/links/01ruz/
    • View Profile
Re: John Murray
« Reply #61 on: Wednesday 25 May 22 20:49 BST (UK) »
Sorry we have to disregard this John Murray who died in 1980.  Should we delete the post that no longer fit who we are looking for? 
No, because we need to keep a record of what has already been proposed and discarded.

It would probably help if you didn't quote the whole of every previous post - just pick out the bit(s) you are responding to by deleting the rest.
Never trust anything you find online (especially submitted trees and transcriptions on Ancestry, MyHeritage, FindMyPast and other commercial web sites) unless it's an image of an original document - and even then be wary because errors can and do occur.

Offline Rosinish

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,241
  • PASSED & PAST
    • View Profile
Re: John Murray
« Reply #62 on: Wednesday 25 May 22 20:57 BST (UK) »
You're quite right that only DNA can ever solve this one - and if JM was not the father of RCM, it could only prove that we are looking for the wrong person, not tell us who the right person was.

But...DNA could lead to the potential father through matching DNA links!

Annie
South Uist, Inverness-shire, Scotland:- Bowie, Campbell, Cumming, Currie

Ireland:- Cullen, Flannigan (Derry), Donahoe/Donaghue (variants) (Cork), McCrate (Tipperary), Mellon, Tol(l)and (Donegal & Tyrone)

Newcastle-on-Tyne/Durham (Northumberland):- Harrison, Jude, Kemp, Lunn, Mellon, Robson, Stirling

Kettering, Northampton:- MacKinnon

Canada:- Callaghan, Cumming, MacPhee

"OLD GENEALOGISTS NEVER DIE - THEY JUST LOSE THEIR CENSUS"