Author Topic: probatesearch website  (Read 15042 times)

Offline Nick_Ips

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 565
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: probatesearch website
« Reply #90 on: Thursday 03 March 22 11:39 GMT (UK) »
I couldn't find a work around on edge, but the work around on firefox works wonderfully.

I don't have access to edge (I try very hard to keep it off my computer  ;) ) but a quick google suggests that the Firefox "No style" setting - which has the effect of disabling cascading style sheets (CSS) - has no direct equivalent in edge.

More googling leaves me thinking it would be easier to install Firefox than try to get it to work with edge.  Unless there are any expert edge users around who know a user-friendly way to disable CSS on a specific site/page without affecting anything else.

Online Millmoor

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,550
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: probatesearch website
« Reply #91 on: Thursday 03 March 22 12:52 GMT (UK) »
One way of seeing the full pages for a search is to refrain from clicking on the  " click to open image and order document form" and use the browser zoom in the top right corner of the screen to enlarge the results page. I am using Chrome and using the zoom to 250% can read and scroll through all the results, including the top of the page. The same method works on edge. I will only open the order document form when I locate one I wish to order.

William
Dent (Haltwhistle and Sacriston), Bell and Jetson (Haltwhistle), Postle, Ward, Longstaff, Purvis, Manners, Parnaby and Hardy (Co. Durham), Kennedy and McRobert (Banffshire), Reid(Bathgate), Watson (Wemyss), Graham (Libberton), Sandilands (Carmichael), Munro (Dingwall)

Offline andrewalston

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,965
  • My granddad
    • View Profile
Re: probatesearch website
« Reply #92 on: Friday 11 March 22 14:21 GMT (UK) »
I've just had a request rejected as "No find".

This apparently is because their "search" facility can not locate the probate, despite it being in the original, printed, Calendar of Probate.

I have demanded that they perform the search again, using the image (from FindMyPast) showing exactly the details I had filled in on their order form.
Looking at ALSTON in south Ribble area, ALSTEAD and DONBAVAND/DUNBABIN etc. everywhere, HOWCROFT and MARSH in Bolton and Westhoughton, PICKERING in the Whitehaven area.

Census information is Crown Copyright. See www.nationalarchives.gov.uk for details.

Offline DW399

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 7
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: probatesearch website
« Reply #93 on: Friday 11 March 22 15:05 GMT (UK) »
I had a number of these rejections recently. The issue I think is that, foolishly, I thought that where they asked for the individual's 'first name' they meant the first name. In fact they mean all the names other than the surname. I have asked for a refund too, and also asked when they will correct the form. I'm not holding my breath.


Offline Watson

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 703
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: probatesearch website
« Reply #94 on: Friday 11 March 22 15:35 GMT (UK) »
How do you get the information about what part of the form is wrong?  When one of mine was rejected as "No Find", I was given no clue as to what was incorrect.  I have asked what was wrong in an e-mail of 22 Feb., but I've had no explanation.

Offline DW399

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 7
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: probatesearch website
« Reply #95 on: Friday 11 March 22 16:24 GMT (UK) »
I've not found a way of discovering what they think the error is.

A few times I have taken a screenshot of my application, so I can check what I've requested, but frankly I usually can't be bothered!

When I had rejections where I had used a single forename, I remembered wondering on filling in the form whether they really meant 'name' in the singular, but decided that if that's what they asked for, they might reject an application with two or more (okay, it sounds as if I overthought that!). I tried one application again, this time with all the forenames, and got the document. I'm pretty confident therefore that the single forename was the issue. I can't prove it of course!

Offline AngelaR

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,034
    • View Profile
Re: probatesearch website
« Reply #96 on: Friday 11 March 22 17:45 GMT (UK) »
I also got a "not found" despite the entry being completely correct as of the printed document from Ancestry and FindMyPast.

However, when I did finally manage to get the page to display on the Probate websote (by searching only on the first couple of letters and paging tediously through the documents) I noticed that their copy has a "folio number" against it, so I wrote off my previous attempt and resubmitted the request quoting the folio number.

Unfortunately, despite many chase-up emails, nothing has so far emerged....
Any census information included in this post is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Especially looking for - Sealey, Rogers, Cannings, Box, Sheppard in Wiltshire; Virgin, Slade, Abbott, Saint, Harper, Silverthorn in Somerset; and Virgin, Tarr, Beer in Devon

And most especially the origins of William Cannings,  a Baptist, born abt 1791 in Broughton Gifford, Wiltshire

Offline ajm314159

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 107
    • View Profile
Re: probatesearch website
« Reply #97 on: Monday 14 March 22 17:28 GMT (UK) »
My experience, which I can easily reproduce but is so bizarre I think it can't be everyone's, is this: when I carefully enter the death date and probate date, those two data are changed when they're copied to the Basket. The change is (always) to subtract 1 day. So for example "07 05 1877" on the order form becomes "6 May 1877" in the Basket. I couldn't believe my eyes so I tried several dates, and found 01 03 1880 went to Feb 29 1880, and 01 01 1877 went to Dec 31 1876.

Of course I didn't notice it at first because it's so strange. And of course it must then fail the subsequent search, and I have had only failures recently.

Any one else see this?
Malton (London)
Eades (Somerset)
Johnson (Wimborne, East Dorset)
Hopkins (Roxburgh., Yorks.)
Kidd (Westmoreland)
Lake (East Cambridgeshire)

Offline ele002

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 829
  • Under Age Grandfather
    • View Profile
Re: probatesearch website
« Reply #98 on: Wednesday 04 May 22 16:06 BST (UK) »
I'm not very keen to re-ignite this old chestnut, but has anyone experienced any problems of late?

I only ask as the other day I ordered 4 Wills without a hitch, although I've not had them delivered yet. I missed ordering one and tried to do it as another order. All went well until I tried to place the order/make payment, when I was met with a message telling me to " contact your administrator". Coincidentally, this is an order that needs a Folio No.. I've retried several times and keep getting the same error notice. I can, however, place other orders no problem.

Also, how do you contact these people to ask how to resolve the issue?

Eric.
Jones:Middleton, Howarth:Manchester, Dean:Ardwick/Manchester, Harvey:Nth Manchester & Elland/West Yorks,  Tattersall:Manchester/Salford/Burnley,  
 Lees:Prestwich/Manchester, Wild : Manchester/Salford,
Davies/Williams :Ruabon/Wrexham
Peace: Burton on Trent