A father and son? Scott Thompson

[Ruskie]

Did misunderstand your first post then Ruskie, or did say the older man in the first photo was the same man in the second photo in colour
Carol

Yes, I originally thought the older man in first photo was the same as man in coloured photo, but after seeing the new photos now am unsure.

[Treetotal]

Oh ok.
Carol

[Neale1961]

I believe the father in 1910 Mary Ann's wedding photo is the same man in blurred colour photo posted originally. The eyebrows - nose and ears have the same shape. There is not much difference in age, just a difference in the quality of the image.

I don't think this is the same man as the first photo posted, but perhaps could be related.

It might have been better to post all photos from the start to avoid the confusion.

[KScott24809]

I believe the father in 1910 Mary Ann's wedding photo is the same man in blurred colour photo posted originally. The eyebrows - nose and ears have the same shape. There is not much difference in age, just a difference in the quality of the image.

I don't think this is the same man as the first photo posted, but perhaps could be related.

It might have been better to post all photos from the start to avoid the confusion.

Thanks, I didnt have access to hand for those originally so many apologies!  Upon reviewing the original hardcopy of the 2nd photo I can see it has written on the back "Great Grandfather Scott". Im not sure who wrote it, but it wouldn't have been myself as he's my great great grandfather. The photo came from my Grandfathers possession before he died but its possible one of his children or neices and nephews wrote that on the back having spoken to someone. So confusing! No wonder my brain is frazzled with it.

I dont think the second photo I posted is the same man in the 1910 wedding photo of Mary Ann's family. But I'm not convinced whether he is also the same man in the first photo I posted. I did a timeline last night of his son Alec (proposed male in first photo) of photos across the ages, from the first known one in 1918 every couple of years to 1974 and I'm still not convinced its him in the first photo.  What a quandary!