Author Topic: 1921 census  (Read 28725 times)

Offline mckha489

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 10,907
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1921 census
« Reply #216 on: Friday 07 January 22 21:31 GMT (UK) »
Or, in the transcript there are TWO. buttons that say copy to clipboard.

click and paste results in email

first is for the names etc
second is for the detail of piece numbers etc.

Offline Rogier

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 121
    • View Profile
Re: 1921 census
« Reply #217 on: Friday 07 January 22 21:33 GMT (UK) »
1921 Census "status"  Any other options other than "single" and "married"?

My g/mother appears as head.  Why did she not add widow?
Allum: Worlingworth/Horham Sfk/Canning Town
Read: Badingham/Framlingham Sfk
Ke(a)ble Horham/Worlingworth
Poague: any
(H)avis: Sry/ Stepney
Bird: Newington Sry.
Burrows: Badingham/Canning Town
Goldfinch:  East London

Offline Rogier

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 121
    • View Profile
Re: 1921 census
« Reply #218 on: Friday 07 January 22 21:35 GMT (UK) »
What does this mean?:

Other records featuring that name
(1 record)

Allum: Worlingworth/Horham Sfk/Canning Town
Read: Badingham/Framlingham Sfk
Ke(a)ble Horham/Worlingworth
Poague: any
(H)avis: Sry/ Stepney
Bird: Newington Sry.
Burrows: Badingham/Canning Town
Goldfinch:  East London

Offline JayG

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,326
    • View Profile
Re: 1921 census
« Reply #219 on: Friday 07 January 22 21:42 GMT (UK) »
1921 Census "status"  Any other options other than "single" and "married"?

My g/mother appears as head.  Why did she not add widow?

Column B is headed 'relationship to head of household'

Column E is headed 'marriage or orphanhood'.    Anyone aged 15 and should should be recorded as either single, married, widowed or divorced.

Jay


Online louisa maud

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,615
    • View Profile
Re: 1921 census
« Reply #220 on: Saturday 08 January 22 02:00 GMT (UK) »
I feel quite disappointed, I have searched where my grandparents lived and nothing comes up, my father and most of his siblings should be there , no sign of any of them, will have another check later

Louisa Maud
Census information is Crown Copyright,
from  www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Granath Sweden and London
Garner, Marylebone Paddington  Northolt Ilford
Garner, Devon
Garner New Zealand
Maddieson
Parkinson St Pancras,
Jenkins Marylebone Paddington
Mizon/Mison/Myson Paddington
Tindal Marylebone Paddington
Tocock, (name changed to Ellis) London
Southam Marylebone, Paddington
Bragg Lambeth 1800's
Edermaniger(Maniger) Essex Kent Canada (Toronto)
Coveney Kent Lambeth
Sondes kent and London

Offline antiquesam

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 383
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1921 census
« Reply #221 on: Saturday 08 January 22 06:33 GMT (UK) »
I've only searched my father in the '21 census and it has cleared up one problem but created several more. I knew he and his two siblings were born out of wedlock, but I found a possible marriage for his mother in 1920, but the certificate gave a different name for her father so I discounted it. The census shows my father as a visitor, and his sister as an adopted daughter of another family at their address. Looking at the marriage certificate again I see she gave this address as her home and one of the witnesses was the occupant shown in '21. So the marriage of Edith Mary Coomber in Devonport is confirmed, but where on earth did she and her husband go and where is her third child Thomas William Henry Coomber who was born in 1916? Why does one mystery always create two more?
Coomber, Scrimgeour, Shiel, Thiel,

Offline stonechat

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,682
    • View Profile
Re: 1921 census
« Reply #222 on: Saturday 08 January 22 07:03 GMT (UK) »
I am finding a few people not showing
One I can understand, mum's bigamous aunt who newly remarried maybe trying to keep a low profile.
However the same ladies brother does not appear, though by finding the rest of his household I fund him
His step daughter and her husband were listed.
I have got about 6 images, to get many more will wait for the records to be free
Just got direct ancestors and some where I am trying to solve some problem
Douglas, Varnden, Joy(i)ce Surrey, Clarke Northants/Hunts, Pullen Worcs/Herefords, Holmes Birmingham/USA/Canada/Australia, Jackson Cheshire/Yorkshire, Lomas Cheshire, Lee Yorkshire, Cocks Lancashire, Leah Cheshire, Cook Yorkshire, Catlow Lancashire
See my website http://www.cotswan.com

Offline normamac

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 793
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1921 census
« Reply #223 on: Saturday 08 January 22 07:52 GMT (UK) »
I feel quite disappointed, I have searched where my grandparents lived and nothing comes up, my father and most of his siblings should be there , no sign of any of them, will have another check later

Louisa Maud
[
/quote]

I had the same problem with my great grandparents but found them eventually. Their name had been transcribed wrong. 
Norma

Offline stonechat

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,682
    • View Profile
Re: 1921 census
« Reply #224 on: Saturday 08 January 22 07:56 GMT (UK) »
I looked for my great grandmother, and could not find her or her two unmarried children who would be with her at the family bakery shop.
I found them by searching by address.
Obviously only works if you know the address
Douglas, Varnden, Joy(i)ce Surrey, Clarke Northants/Hunts, Pullen Worcs/Herefords, Holmes Birmingham/USA/Canada/Australia, Jackson Cheshire/Yorkshire, Lomas Cheshire, Lee Yorkshire, Cocks Lancashire, Leah Cheshire, Cook Yorkshire, Catlow Lancashire
See my website http://www.cotswan.com