Where was no. 38, and was it a tenement?
Here is the 1948 1:1250 map showing house numbers in Bridgeton. Number 38 is on the east side of the road at the top of the map and near the junction with Invertiel Road etc.. It is clearly different from the other buildings in the locality.
https://maps.nls.uk/view/102735137#zoom=4.4&lat=6703&lon=3204&layers=BTWas it a tenement? In the 1905 valuation rolls I have identified no. 38 by cross-referencing names in newspaper articles with occupants. It is a little confusing because the newspaper articles always refer to addresses in Bridgeton whereas the valuation rolls have the addresses as Bridge Street, but I have found so many matching names that I am confident that I have the correct address. In 1905 there are 10 occupancies listed for number 38 Bridge Street, but of these 9 are empty. The other is occupied by a Thomas Crombie, bleachfield worker, and there is a Thomas Crombie, dyer, of 38 Bridgeton who features in newspaper articles in 1904.
So, it was a tenement of some sort, but apparently not a desirable place to live at that time.
Added: comparing the earlier Town Plans with the 1948 map, it seems that there has been some demolition in the vicinity of no. 38, and nos. 40 and 42 are missing from the sequence.