Author Topic: Anti-vaxxers' arguments  (Read 7145 times)

Offline Forguette

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 142
  • Census information Crown Copyright, www.nationalar
    • View Profile
Re: Anti-vaxxers' arguments
« Reply #54 on: Friday 03 September 21 18:09 BST (UK) »
Semantics, trials/experiments. Still leaves a lot of guinea pigs, no matter how  you split the terminology.
This being a family history forum, I think it is fair to expect a high percentage of experienced, historical researchers, whose capabilities stretch beyond 2020 and the onset of covid. Who can go back as far as their searches take them. Who can then assimilate or join the dots of those searches and form their own conclusions, opinions and decisions based on those findings.
They reserve and deserve that right .
Nobody has the right to demand that someone else should be forced to comply with their opinion/decision. No matter WHO they may be, or what 'position' they hold.
Emotional appeals of don't mention/consider/research/refer to... it's hurtful to Jews, is in itself harmful.
I may be Jewish.
I may be Jewish and multi vaccinated.
It's not about Jews, they were only one segment of a targeted population. It's not even about Nazis, it went beyond and further back than that.
Aktion T4 was ongoing before either of the World Wars. The main advocates, among others, being USA, CANADA, DENMARK.
Soldiers enlisting for WW1, had to comply to be vaccinated, conscription effectively was forced medical compliance. Many of these soldiers died as a result of vaccination before they even had a chance to die abroad.
Covid is just another link in a very long chain of scientists and their ideas/ideals.
Some may say that the Mad Scientists have taken over. The lunatics running the asylum so to speak.
Science and Technology and religion, my personal research and experience, my dots, join to form a much bigger picture than what is shown on the surface of each individual dot.
But these are my opinions, of which I have the right to form and to go by. I don't insist that you must adhere to them.
I do insist that you research and find your own dots, to form and follow your own bigger picture... and that your research goes beyond 2020.
As I have already said, this is a family history forum, that is why I chose to be on this forum, that is why I am here. This is not a medical research forum, I'm sure there are plenty medical forums to be joined if that is your wont. The only connection I can see is the use of unwitting family history researchers who upload their Dna/genetics to form a worldwide database.
Let's hope they, or their descendants don't suffer because of that decision.
Our original OP has declined to join his own thread apparently, left his inflammatory post, jumped in once, reply #11, with the tired (and tiresome) old trope about conspiracy theories then shuffled off to hide. In street parlance, a troublemaker, a sh*t stirrer and nothing more.
In summary, this forum is not the place for this topic. But it does show that facism is still alive and festering.

Offline Erato

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,906
  • Old Powder House, 1703
    • View Profile
Re: Anti-vaxxers' arguments
« Reply #55 on: Friday 03 September 21 18:23 BST (UK) »
Deplorable.
Wiltshire:  Banks, Taylor
Somerset:  Duddridge, Richards, Barnard, Pillinger
Gloucestershire:  Barnard, Marsh, Crossman
Bristol:  Banks, Duddridge, Barnard
Down:  Ennis, McGee
Wicklow:  Chapman, Pepper
Wigtownshire:  Logan, Conning
Wisconsin:  Ennis, Chapman, Logan, Ware
Maine:  Ware, Mitchell, Tarr, Davis

Offline Forguette

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 142
  • Census information Crown Copyright, www.nationalar
    • View Profile
Re: Anti-vaxxers' arguments
« Reply #56 on: Friday 03 September 21 18:31 BST (UK) »
Yes erato, so you keep saying.
Means nothing, adds nothing.
But it is your opinion and you're entitled to it.

Offline Little Nell

  • Global Moderator
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 11,931
    • View Profile
Re: Anti-vaxxers' arguments
« Reply #57 on: Friday 03 September 21 18:35 BST (UK) »
Time to move on, I think.

Courtesy, good manners and tolerance - please, everyone try to remember that, however hard it may be at times.

Nell

Topic locked

All census information: Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk