I'm fairly new to genealogy, and yesterday came across the first criminal in my tree. She'd stolen a blanket, and for that crime she was sentenced to 7 years transportation to Van Dieman's Land. I was stunned at the severity of the punishment, but looking at other sentences in the list, it looks as though she got off quite lightly - someone convicted of stealing half a crown - sentence - death! This was 1830, and I wonder if this severity of punishment was the norm in England at this time, or if these were a set of particularly harsh judges?