Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Lunacy Patients Admission Registers - Discharge conditions  (Read 1042 times)

Offline jonwarrn

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,362
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Lunacy Patients Admission Registers - Discharge conditions
« Reply #9 on: Sunday 20 June 21 09:54 BST (UK) »
No, it says Received to care of husband ;D

So, on those two examples,
"Relieved = recovered from acute illness and can return home or to another hospital"
looks a good definition!

Offline Watson

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 703
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Lunacy Patients Admission Registers - Discharge conditions
« Reply #10 on: Sunday 20 June 21 10:31 BST (UK) »
At Bethlem in 1851, patients were not allowed to remain there above twelve months.  I don't know if that applied to other establishments.

Offline northern_rose

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 630
  • At least one of my ancestors was glamorous!
    • View Profile
Re: Lunacy Patients Admission Registers - Discharge conditions
« Reply #11 on: Sunday 20 June 21 13:36 BST (UK) »
Thanks for you help and comments everyone - they have helped me to understand the records I was looking at.
Wilson in the Lancaster area
Clegg in Todmorden
Adamson in Edinburgh
Miller in Edinburgh
Nunn in Norfolk and Co Durham
Smith in Glasgow
Haig in Peebles/Edinburgh
Also Nelson, Gardener, Garnett, Blair, Coleman, Aaronson and many more as the branches expand!

Census info is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Pages: 1 [2]