James Byrne and Margaret Duggan, California

[RJ137]

What I find odd is that James Bryne is buried in plot - G 21 27 2.

Margaret Weber died in 1947. She is buried in plot - G 21 27 2 also.

Find A Grave: https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/105548982/margaret-weber

 The San Francisco Examiner
San Francisco, California
12 Sep 1947, Fri  •  Page 15

Obit: https://www.newspapers.com/clip/77843968/margaret-weber-obit-1947/

===

Margaret's 2nd husband Joseph T Weber died in 1949. He is buried in the same cemetery, but in plot- 2 15 g108

Find A Grave: https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/107420816/joseph-t-weber

 The San Francisco Examiner
San Francisco, California
08 May 1949, Sun  •  Page 31

Obit: https://www.newspapers.com/clip/77844777/joseph-weber-obit-1949/

=======

Alice Amend's husband Charles E Amend died in 1948. He is buried in the same cemetery, plot- G 21 27 g1

Find A Grave: https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/107700661/charles-e-amend

Death: https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QKD4-P14S

That 75-year-old James Byrne seems listed at that cemetery and plot number seems out of place with everything else...very strange?

[RJ137]

Here's a link to the Holy Cross-Colma Cemetery Index. You can do a search by name or by plot. Plot G 21 27 gave lots of names. The dates listed on the results are burial dates. The James Byrne in plot- G 21 27 is listed as with a burial date of 12 July 1902.

https://www.sfgenealogy.org/php/cemetery/cemeteryindex.php

[Genealiza]

James Byrne:  d. Jul 1902

https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:HGC6-FWMM

His address at death is the same as on the 1900 census

[Genealiza]

On the database provided by R J:

Jas Byrne, buried 1 May 1902
Sec F
Row 8
Area 19
Grave 2

[Genealiza]

Obituary:  The San Francisco Call
                11 July 1902

[Bellevue]

Great work guys, thanks.
Very confusing that his wife went into the plot with the other seemingly unrelated, 75 year old, James Byrne. Very odd. A mix up of some sort?

Going by the obit of the real James Byrne that I am looking for - he has aged by 12 years. He was down as 32 years in 1900. If he truly was closer to 46 years then thats a pity, I thought I might be able to catch him in the Irish civil records starting 1864.

[Genealiza]

No, her memorial has the correct grave site location.  The James who dies in Apr has the wrong gravesite information.  I have entered a memorial for James and am trying to get the photo of the 3 names moved to the correct memorial.

https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/227223915/james-byrne

[Bellevue]

No, her memorial has the correct grave site location.  The James who dies in Apr has the wrong gravesite information.  I have entered a memorial for James and am trying to get the photo of the 3 names moved to the correct memorial.

https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/227223915/james-byrne

Ah ok, so that was just a findagrave mix up then.
Thanks

[Genealiza]

Looks like everything has been straightened out on the findagrave memorial.