Might have mentioned this before, but knowing now who George snr's siblings were, I wonder whose death this was reported in 1725 - not Thomas or Finch?
"On Saturday last, Major-General Rooke, Brother to the
late Admiral Sir George Rooke, was bury'd at Isleworth in
Middlesex."
Jan. 19, 1725, The Post Boy
Hayman or Heyman Rooke, son of Lawrence Rooke according to
https://www.ashefamily.infoSee my reply #72 about this website. I suspect misprints with some dates of births & deaths.
I looked at Rooke on the Surnames list on the Ashe site. Couldn't spot a death in 1725. Checked military men alive in 17th & 18th centuries + other men alive then.
Major-General Hayman Rooke sometime of Canterbury, afterwards of Isleworth, County Middlesex. Baptised at Horton 10th Feb. 1653. Captain 1677; Colonel 1703; Brigadier 1706/7; Major-General 1709/10. Died Jan. 1724/5. Buried Isleworth. Will 1722, proved 1724 by Disney Rooke, relict (widow).
Lawrence Rooke, (b. 1622) father of Hayman, had several sons, according to Ashe family website. Another was George, also born 1653, also a soldier. Lieutenant in Duke & Duchess of York Infantry 1684; (another George Rooke was lieutenant in same regiment at same time); Captain 1709. George was Lawrence's heir (Ashe family website).
Lawrence's parents were George Rooke (b. 1580) & Mary Burrell.
If the above is correct, the newspaper was wrong about the relationship of the Admiral and the Major-General.