« Reply #46 on: Sunday 08 January 23 14:01 GMT (UK) »
Some of the men who married a pregnant woman may not have known that they would be taking on another man's child
Only DNA can show whether the biological ancestor was the husband or another man .
Out of 100% I wonder how common that was for the man to marry a pregnant woman but was not the father of the child, either through the fact she had slept with more than one man at around the time of conception etc? I am hoping that was the exception rather than the rule.
Researching:
LONDON, Coombs, Roberts, Auber, Helsdon, Fradine, Morin, Goodacre
DORSET Coombs, Munday
NORFOLK Helsdon, Riches, Harbord, Budery
KENT Roberts, Goodacre
SUSSEX Walder, Boniface, Dinnage, Standen, Lee, Botten, Wickham, Jupp
SUFFOLK Titshall, Frost, Fairweather, Mayhew, Archer, Eade, Scarfe
DURHAM Stewart, Musgrave, Wilson, Forster
SCOTLAND Stewart in Selkirk
USA Musgrave, Saix
ESSEX Cornwell, Stock, Quilter, Lawrence, Whale, Clift
OXON Edgington, Smith, Inkpen, Snell, Batten, Brain