Deciphering text on a Northern Irish marriage registration

[gaffy]

The words 'Lived Private' (ie. private means / income, there are lots of examples of 'living private' stated for occupation in the 1901 and 1911 Ireland censuses) would indicate that Andrew Moore was deceased.  I also wondered about the following local newspaper death notice in April 1874: 'MOORE - April 10, at Randalstown, Nancy, relict of the late Mr. Andrew Moore, aged 66 years.'. Relating to that notice (albeit death date is out by a day), there is the following gravestone inscription in Drummaul Church of Ireland graveyard: 'Erected by George Moore, in loving memory of his father, Andrew Moore, died, 5th February 1863, also his mother, Annie Moore, died, 11th April 1874'. Just a possibility.

[gaffy]

... Also, when a Mary Elizabeth Craig of Randalstown, Drummaul (widow of a linen manufacturer) died in 1880 ...
https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/deaths_returns/deaths_1880/06480/4864243.pdf

... the local newspaper death notice read 'Craig - At the residence of her daughter, Randalstown, on the 13th inst., Mary E. Craig, of Frenchpark, aged 80 years.'.
 

Further to the above Mary Elizabeth Craig who died in 1880, she is buried in the Old Congregation Presbyterian Church Cemetery at Randalstown, here is the grave inscription:

Erected to the memory of John Craig, who departed this life, October 8th 1826, aged 72 years, also, of Agnes, his wife, who departed this life, January 19th 1830, aged 70 years, likewise, of their son, John junior, who departed this life January 29th 1848, aged 57 years, also, of their son, James, who departed this life, September 16th 1861, aged 70 years, and Mary E Craig, wife of the above named John Craig, junior, died, 13th March 1880, aged 80 years

Grave image:
https://images.findagrave.com/photos/2016/258/169960947_1473966009.jpg

[heywood]

Thanks gaffy = great information.

[darianb]

Thank you everyone, this is all amazing information. It's given me several new angles to investigate.

Something that stands out are the signatures on the two different registrations. Would you say James Moore's signature is significantly different? The reason I ask is that I'm trying to see if it's the same James Moore who married Victoria Brown in 1859 but the writing looks quite different. The other issue is that his father, Andrew, was a farmer rather than having lived private.

[Karen McDonald]

Hi,

The 2 signatures are completely different. Even allowing for a change of style over time...

Best regards,
Karen

[heywood]

Not sure if this refers to your people

Calendar of Wills
1868
Andrew Moore - late of Dagmar Street Belfast , Gentleman, a Widower died 29 May 1868
Letters of Administration granted to James Moore, Beersbridge Cottage, Ballymacarrett, CountyDown, Flax Merchant, one of the next of kin.

[arthurk]

This one is not quite the same - easier to read but no line near the second occupation.
It looks like ‘Lived private’ 

https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/marriage_returns/marriages_1868/11464/8213477.pdf

Ooooh... I wonder why there are 2 registration records for the same marriage? 

(assuming the OP's version is 1868, even though it looks like 1865)

The image from GRONI in the OP's first post looks as though it's from an original register. (I'm not sure how GRONI sourced their images, but if the system is similar to the English one, it may be from a register that was lodged at a local register office when it was full.)

The image that heywood found at irishgenealogy.ie appears to be of the quarterly return sent in by the minister. You can tell this by the form of certification at the bottom of the page - and it also means that the 'signatures' in that image are actually the minister's transcription of the original entries.

[Elwyn Soutter]

[

The image from GRONI in the OP's first post looks as though it's from an original register. (I'm not sure how GRONI sourced their images, but if the system is similar to the English one, it may be from a register that was lodged at a local register office when it was full.)

The image that heywood found at irishgenealogy.ie appears to be of the quarterly return sent in by the minister. You can tell this by the form of certification at the bottom of the page - and it also means that the 'signatures' in that image are actually the minister's transcription of the original entries.
[/quote]

The system for church weddings was that the couple signed two registers. One was kept by the church and the other sent off to the GRO on a quarterly basis.  In 1922, when Ireland was partitioned, GRO clerks in Dublin copied all the marriages and so created the set you see on the irishgenealogy site. GRONI acquired the originals (for Northern Ireland) and you can see them on their site.

[arthurk]

The system for church weddings was that the couple signed two registers. One was kept by the church and the other sent off to the GRO on a quarterly basis.  In 1922, when Ireland was partitioned, GRO clerks in Dublin copied all the marriages and so created the set you see on the irishgenealogy site. GRONI acquired the originals (for Northern Ireland) and you can see them on their site.

Thanks, Elwyn - I hadn't known about the copying process in 1922. But I do have one observation: in England both registers are kept in the church until they are full, and the quarterly return is a separate sheet of paper which is sent to the local superintendent registrar, who collates the returns for his district and forwards them to the GRO. Are you sure it wasn't the same here? (The wording at the foot of the irishgenealogy.ie image indicates that a copy was submitted rather than the actual register.)

However, I agree that the GRONI images seem to be of the original registers, since they show a variety of signatures.